Yeah I didn’t like his answers regarding early access and fair , as he specifically was talking of “Competitive players” as that makes early access even worse.
The record If I remember correctly to reach max level was 12 hours from 1 to max by a hunter. so 72 hours head start its safe to say these competitors may have 4 to 7 character max and ready to go probably even exploiting market get their professions up over a competitor that starts 3 days later.
That is not fair at all. 
Weren’t DF professions somewhat weekly locked? So, they won’t get ahead at all, but they will meet the available ceiling before others, but who cares about that? 
I didn’t do professions so I might be talking whatevers.
I was way off. 27. Mostly clarification-type questions rather than any new information, though.
Ok ill take a simple example- Sevrite ore was costing 55g per ore at launch, today it costs 50 silver. Forget about the other 2 rare ores , rare recipes and world drops , just the common one
Now expand it to literally everything in the game . Ppl who start early will have hte advantage.
Blizzard should have done the feedback first before releasing the editions .Now its too late and we have to live with it .
Tons of Warband questions that could have all been summed up into a single general question. So not many real questions at all, which is not surprising. Disappointed that none of the guild questions made it through.
This is true, I was thinking too much about production. But isn’t the higher edition somewhat equivalent to WoW token? I mean, the headstart they have, will it be enough to cover a token? I’m after an idea is it the same to buy the head start and play or just get wow token and skip grindin?
EDIT:
If the early access costs 30dollars → could you grind enough of gold in 3 days that would be worth 30 dollars?
They’re not going to answer questions that would necessitate answers prematurely announcing content.
Do you think they’ll answer more questions or no?
No, there’s 2300+ comments, they should keep doing videos with answers but i doubt it.
Also, a lot of questions are duplicates or similar.
IMO, Some questions that were picked were really bad, like the one that says “Will we see the Trading post in the next xpact as well?”, I don’t know what’s the logic behind this question for the player who asked this. I don’t see any signs that the trading post will be canceled, removed, changed…at all
We needed a better question regarding the trading post instead of that one, In my opinion.
Yeah and my question was basically if blizzard going to bring back removed quests, and in the Wotlk classic keep the battle of the undercity, they didn’t answer that
Azerothian Archives seems a lot like prematurely announced content, granted it’s coming in one of the three remaining DF updates and not TWW.
There’s still plenty they could have answered that wouldn’t lead to prematurely announced content. Addressing the piss poor state of the guild system since they announced cross-realm guilds would have been nice.
Well, they at least answered one of the questions I had. The actual question wasn’t mine, but it was similar.
“No two-handed Enhancement Shaman or dual-wielding Survival Hunter”. 
They cited itemization issues with loot tables.
A pretty standard thing for corporate PR flunkies to do it ask for public input, then ask the acceptable questions they want asked, using the flood of public input as a screen. So I hope the gaming press has made a list of publicly submitted questions.