Blizzard Survey: New Classes

Interesting, i did not know they were “Notorious”. Do you have other examples of them fabricating things like this?

2 Likes

These sound made up and stupid.
Blizzard can’t even balance the classes they have, stop asking for more.

3 Likes

I have faith in you. You can do your own research.

You have to agree at the beginning of the survey to not distribute it to others. It’s not as in-depth as an NDA but it’s there.

1 Like

If there is real there is def an NDA that is being broken to high heck >.>

I guess if this post gets removed we’ll get pseudo confirmation on if this is real or not :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

So that is a no?

3 Likes

If I see a person on the street trying to survey people, I would rather turn and walk all the way around the earth to my destination two blocks away, rather than take their survey.

1 Like

Idk. Were you able to do something by yourself or not?

I just want a mail wearing class that I actually want to play. Hunters are a no go because ewwwwwwwwww, gross. Evokers are a definite no because ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, gross!!! Shamans are a maybe but elemental is such a borked spec it isn’t even funny. They need at least a good 3 or 4 spells deleted from the class to be actually playable. Like, why the hell is there lighting bolt and chain lightning??? Pick one and delete the other FFS.

if anything tinkerer would be the next one
it makes sense next to shaman tank lol

Basically either someone broke an NDA or gave the idea they did to make it look more authentic

1 Like

He posted this on Reddit as well :unamused:

1 Like

because one is a single target spell and one is an aoe spell.

2 Likes

I feel like most of these would be better off as a new specialization or hero spec.

Tinker: New Class

Prismatic: priest/mage

Bard: New class

Gunner: hunter/tinker(maybe rogue/warrior)

Astrologer: mage (maybe druid, steps on boomkin)

Apothecary: tinker spec/hero spec

Witch: Warlock/priest

Celestial Lancer: warrior

Battlemage: Warrior/mage (maybe rogue)

Artificer: tinker spec/hero spec

Leyweaver: mage/evoker

Gunslinger: Exact same thing as Gunner. Either option would likely take from both concepts to make a full kit.

Titankiller: Warrior. (Weakest concept)

Necromancer: DK/Warlock. (Maybe new class, would make sense to combine with witch concept)

Warden: Rogue/Warrior/Hunter

Spellbreaker: Warrior/Paladin. Very similar concept to Battlemage

Edit: they provided 3 possible specs that could work for tinker. I feel it’s a pretty good chance we will see them

I did with no luck. You are the one who said “notorious”. Do you know what that words means? I would assume if it is as notrious as you claim, examples would be easy to find. Im not, claiming the survey is true, only trying to corroborate your claim. Are you trying to debunk it under false pretenses?

You’re going to be shocked when you learn that there’s more than one person on the internet posting things.

3 Likes

The overlaps in Battlemage, Warden and Spellbreaker is why I think it makes sense as one overlapping class (also thematic for midnight) - magical elven warrior, two specs of which are all about taking down rogue mages, and you have a choice of heroes (imo Maiev, Anasterian and maybe Silgryn if you want iconic characters in a way that covers all the main elven tribes)

Astromancer is a thing for nightborne, blood elves and void elves (the scryers were big on that kind of magic and then Star Augur Etraeus represents a subset of magical praxis in Suramar) and could be WoW’s astrologian. Arguably throw in bits of shadow magic that aren’t about the old gods from other classes and you could make it a class that encompasses the Elunite priesthood too (potentially better than priest does).

Still I am a bit dubious this is real and if it is lmao at the broken NDA

1 Like

I have to stop checking this thread. I genuinely can’t tell if the replies you’re getting are ragebait or if the average GD posters are really this dumb. It’s like their first day on the internet or something and no one has shown them google.

2 Likes

First priority should be figuring out the support role. The spec of augmentation and how to balance that! What other classes can have support spec! Until than a new class shouldn’t even be a consideration!