Recently a thread was made suggesting to add a body type 2 option for the metamorphosis rune. The approach in the original thread required some more sincere streamlining so this is my effort to do so, in hopes that it can be discussed in a more sincere tone and possibly reach the eyes of the developers. Please keep it civil.
-
Doing this would not be the first inclusion from blizzard to support an alternative body type for a character model, Please take a look at the inclusion of the body type 1 version of succubus which features more masculine body shapes.
-
This would Give more options to the player to approach the rune visually in the distinction they would prefer.
-
No advantages or disadvantages would diffrentiate the two body type options, they would operate identically the same.
These are just the few critical details that come to mind.
7 Likes
Vouch. We create our characters with representation in mind.
1 Like
No.
Meta form is unisex. Your feeble mortal mind is just assigning the gender that it wants.
1 Like
i dont see how thats true by any means, the voice, physical features directly dictate it is a masculine body type and by no means represent a feminine body type. Pectoral chest, broad thighs, broad shoulders etc
3 Likes
since they gave us a whole questline for summon incubus, they should give us a body type 2 metamorphosis
2 Likes
it’s funny because if you use this argument for other things, you’ll get shouted down and banned for “transphobia”
lol
Yeah the Meta Form is neither male nor female. Has no clothes but also has no genitals. It is truly sexless.
that didnt seem to impact their decision when they made type 2 for succubus, im sure it wont in the case of making a second option for meta.
Incubus and Succubus wear (skimpy) clothes and presumably have sexual organs underneath those clothes. Meta Form does not.
I don’t see why this is an issue at all - just do it, can’t hurt to have more diversity and the model and rigging is already mostly done anyways.
4 Likes
you miiiiiight wanna go back to grade school with this logic friend lol meta clearly has a pectoral chest and sculpted type 1 features that do not represent a type 2 physique in it’s simplest form… But if thats being too coy, there are no mammary glands present.
You should also look up the actual definition of “Body type”. The only person here talking about sexual organs and genitalia is you.
2 Likes
A visual choice, similar to the one they made during character creation, is all that is being asked for. Being against this while also using said choice during your own character creation is baffling.
1 Like
Welcome, to the World of Pandercraft.
“Make it lame”
Welcome, to the World of Pandercraft.
“Make it lame”
Easy to shout pandering when you’ve never had to think about feeling represented lol.
It’s a suggestion. Just go about your day. You lose nothing by others gaining.
1 Like
yes, its this type of attitude that only makes me want us to get this even more now.
Please make this happen. Blizzard you better be watching this thread!
2 Likes