Once again, as Eilethalua said:
You deemed it as “trollish” behavior, even though others did not. It’s still a form of disagreeing with their behavior. Just like Pollz pointed out:
Seeing as how others didn’t flag them, as much as you, it is of a “common perception” that others don’t deem it as “trolling”.
IDC who’s ignoring me. This is a discussion, and I’m merely discussing the topic, at hand. You just refuse to believe/see the reality.
You didn’t read any of my responses did you?
Keep trying to “discuss”. You’re getting there.
Where did I say I reported/want to report someone I disagree with? Please source.
What in the Sam heck is going on in this thread???
If you dislike the nature or frequency of the commentary and you refuse to be proactive to inure yourself to dissent I don’t know what else to say to you. I’d tell my grown children to adult up but I won’t assume your age either physical or mental. You do have a choice here and you seem to be needlessly choosing to be outraged when simple things could prevent this.
I’m not going to respond further to you as this is appearing to be you taking things way too personally. I wish you a good rest of your day/week.
I did, but there’s a difference between saying something and actually doing it. Before I played the role of “devil’s advocate”, you turned a blind eye to my rule-breaking. It wasn’t, until you found me irritating, that you were ready to add me onto your “Report List”, validating their points.
I’m already here. Just waiting for you to catch up.
Well, this Thread for one, is a clear sign you reported two individuals, that you deemed are partaking in “Trollish” behavior. Which means you disagree with their conduct. And this:
You never said that, to me, before I began pressing your buttons.
You, literally, proved both Eilethalua’s and Pollz’s point, to a T.
That’s technically true… Not sure what your point is.
Mine is that your name can very easily be interpreted as containing a word the forums prohibit, which I found amusing because of the number of times you’ve taken offense to the word cuck; which while it does have pejorative connotations, isn’t explicitly vulgar, and is NOT prohibited on the forums. Also, all the times people have used that word, we’ve been talking about things we’ve been called on the forums, I haven’t seen anyone, today, using that term to actually insult anyone.
Nobody looks at bonereaver and thinks " is that saying ‘bone®’ ‘eaver’? Because ‘eaver’ isn’t a word. With your name it’s very easy to think is the second word rover or over?
Edgelord.
I don’t have one in this case. Just answering your questions.
I do have a choice. Great observation. Guess what I did with said choice.
I made another thread to highlight the issue.
Good day to you too ma’am.
Exactly. When you have to resort to name calling, you lost the argument, just FYI.
You can’t assert that. That’s not fair. You’re not the curator for fights on the internet. I won that fight just as fairly as you lost it. #winning
*Proceeds to chain block quote you all while repeating myself over and over
Following logic. What you did is an ad hominem attack. Instead of addressing the issue, at hand, you went for talking about me, personally. It invalidates your argument.
Incorrect. Try again.
Because you refuse to accept the reality, of the situation. I am not the only one telling you these same valid arguments, you refuse to believe, about yourself.
How ironic…
You didn’t.
You read my responses but they didn’t fit you narrative. Good try again, but you’re still quite confused.
You have a right, to your opinion, but I am in agreement with the “common perception”. So far, you are alone, in your assessment. Meanwhile, I have others, in agreement with me, about your behavior.
I did, but your actions invalidated them.
Now, we’re back to projecting.
Again, what is your objective in all this?
I made a post about how people who spam threads with irrelevant content need to be reported more.
Are you going to continue to reply until you feel like you’ve guilted/shamed me enough?
I’m more so concerned with your inability to read thoroughly.
And incase you didn’t see my next post, a certain someone hasn’t been posting on the forums since the mods came by about an hour ago.
This thread still going on?
Yarp. But guess who hasn’t made a post for about an hour after the mods came into the forums.
Looks like I wasn’t the only one who got tired of the obvious trolling.
I have told you, time and time, again. You just nitpick parts of my post, that you don’t like and completely ignore the rest of my very valid arguments. Let’s try this, again. This time, don’t get distracted by words that you don’t like.
You claim that both Eilethalua and Pollz are incorrect. When I have demonstrated how they are correct. How? You were turning a blind eye to my rule-breaking, when I was conducting myself a certain way, that suited you. Now, that you find me irritating, you want to add me on your “Report List”. Validating both Eilethalua’s and Pollz’s point.
Right. And you felt like what both Eilethalua and Pollz were saying were “not true”, when it fact they were true.
No, I want you to take into consideration other people’s points of views, aside from your own. And that both of Eilethalua’s and Pollz’s points were validated.
Likewise.
It’s, also, a possibility, they got bored of this thread.
Not reading your garbage since you don’t read anything.
Let me post this for you again.
Do you need directions to the nearest Sylvan?
If you can’t get your point across in one line or less, it’s not a very good point.
Then there is no discussion to be had, if you refuse to engage in civil discourse that challenges your views.
No need to read “your garbage”, if you’re not interested in reading mine. It doesn’t work that way.
That would be very lovely, thank you for offering.
I am, you just don’t like that I am countering each of your points, in one line or less.
Goodness, you can’t count either.
Majority of my points have been one line or less. Just because you want to plug your ears and pretend it doesn’t exist, doesn’t invalidate my argument.