Blizzard hates all players who can’t do M10 or higher!

Gameplay Dungeons, Raids and Scenarios
1

Premade Group filter…

Try this, (as a level 60 player) in premade group search type: 12
Results: M11, M12, M13

Awesome!!

Try this, (as a level 60 player) in premade group search type: 2
Results: M16, M10, M2 , M12, M16, +18, fast 220 loot

if I search for anything (2 digits) like 10 or higher, I get results, but if I’m a noob and searching for a M+2 (M1-M3,) I am denied.

Blizzard has a pure hatred for new players, only those who played during first 3 months could have completed low level keys, and everyone else is locked out by design.

2

Aliens are coming! The world is ending tomorrow.

Unicorns are running through the streets.

See… I can do it too.

3

so by your sarcastic remarks, it means NOT REAL, doesn’t matter.

Well you don’t matter to me, your just an internet troll, seemingly full of the hatred that prompted Blizzard to enact rules which work against casual players who don’t spend 20+ hours a week to enhance their toons.

see i can do it too… (omg, that was something a 4-year old might say) By looks of your accrued achievement points I would think you are a little bit older and wiser than to say such childish things.

1 Like
4

idk if bait, but there is no M1, there is M0 (non key mythic) and Mythic keys start at 2, so the way to search for the lowest keys it to just put +3 in search and apply to +2s.

5

i know, maybe I should have used 13 & 3 as examples, and I tried +2 and +3, search results are not near as clean as if I search for 12, and get only returns of 11, 12, and 13. That is optimal, it is what I want to happen even on the lower keys.

6

What do you mean by clean?

edit: I just tested by using +3/+4/+5/+6/+7/+8/+9 and the search returned resultes as expected. The search returns 4/5/6 if you search +5, or 7/8/9 if you search +8.

Please explain further.

7

I tried +3
results: +2, +3, +4, but all the m2, m3, m4 and variations were excluded.

if i search 13
results 12, 13, 14, m12, m13, m14, m+12, m+13, M+14

any single digit number is ignored, so i have to do multiple searches on m2, m+2 ect… these searches are time-dependent, they disappear, and have to be refreshed often to see new results.

why not just allow us to view by M+ selected by the person starting the group? then when it’s sorted we can see all of the groups which are within +/- 1 M+ level of what you have chosen.

8

Yep just test using only 5 as a search function, you do get +4/+5/+6 and m5 and so on, but you also get +14/+15/+16 - pretty inconvienent.

I would say simply preappend your search with a + because the bulk of keys will be listed as +x

9

yes but if you are searching for a 14-16, its actually very easy for you. just type 15, and you will get the results you need.

It seems unbalanced, to the point the system favors those who move past m10, and accept all of the affixes.

10

The reason it’s like this is because 5 will return results for anything with 5, and 15 will return anything with 15, so if there we’re +115 keys, it would have a similar issue. I don’t think it’s unbalanced as it still provides you with all the listed keys you would want, just more cluttered to use, and annoying.

11

then simple block it from working for anyone else then.

when its completely broke and everyone complains maybe they would fix it right? nope, its Blizzard they failed big time on LFR and refused to ever go back and do it right, didn’t they?

12

Um, maybe because low keys are filling up quickly for valor runs or they have all been boosted already above that.

You could also run your own key.

13

You are ranting & having a hulk level fit because the filter function is not perfect?

1 Like
14

Try using quotes around the number; so use “+5” rather than just +5 alone. The quote should bring back results that contain an exact match within the quotes. This would omit results like +15 or numbers including 5.

1 Like