Blizzard’s Inaction on Botting, Censorship, Automated Reports & Server Instability – A Call for Transparency

Over the past week, players have endured multiple service interruptions, yet there has been little meaningful communication from Blizzard on what’s being done to address the underlying issues. I asked legitimate questions, whether recent tech stack changes, business impact analysis, disaster recovery planning, or incident response protocols had led to any tangible improvements. Instead of an answer, my post was removed within an hour.

Given Blizzard’s history with any critical piece of information, this post will likely face the same fate. But the larger question remains: At what point does willful inaction on a problem this widespread stop being simple negligence and start looking like a predatory business practice? Blizzard is profiting from subscriptions while knowingly allowing bots to devalue the game and ruin the experience for legitimate players.

If player reports are ignored, if bots are left unchecked, and if those who speak out are silenced, what message does that send to paying customers? Is this incompetence, or is it something far worse?

I can attach the screenshots of the GM discussion if this post actually makes it 30 minutes without being taken down. If Blizzard refuses to provide transparency, then what expectation should players reasonably have that things will improve?

In an attempt to address the issues with Blizzard’s customer support and infrastructure, I engaged directly with a Game Master (GM) through a support ticket. Unfortunately, the response I received was evasive and dismissive, highlighting a clear lack of transparency and a failure to address key concerns. The GM’s reply repeatedly deflected legitimate questions, claiming that the issues raised were either misunderstandings or outside the scope of their team’s responsibilities. He also minced no words in saying that the moderation Team/GM often don’t take care of issues like this, but like to involve themselves anyway.

Key takeaways from the interaction:

  1. Template Responses & AI Denial: The GM acknowledged that templates are used, but dismissed concerns about their relevance and frequency. This ignored the larger issue that many players consistently receive unhelpful, templated replies that fail to address specific problems.

  2. Keyword-Based Automation: While denying the use of AI, the GM admitted to using automated keyword-based responses. This effectively makes the support system reliant on rudimentary automation that often misinterprets player issues, resulting in frustration and unresolved tickets.

  3. Escalation Failures & System Flaws: The GM downplayed concerns about ticket resolution, admitting that “mass replies” sometimes prevent further dialogue, a flaw that has been an ongoing issue. Additionally, the lack of an effective escalation process only exacerbates customer dissatisfaction. There was a line hinting that no one on the moderation team or GM team is capable of fixing issues like what I addressed and that actually getting a response from anyone in the Dev side or Community Management was unlikely.

  4. DDoS Mitigation & Communication: The GM offered a vague defense of Blizzard’s DDoS response, implying that it is reactive rather than proactive. This is a major concern, given Blizzard’s resources under Microsoft, yet outages continue unabated, suggesting a deeper failure in infrastructure. Pending more transparent information, we’re left to assume it is sub-standard for the industry.

  5. Censorship of Criticism: When I pressed the GM on Blizzard’s frequent censorship of critical posts, they claimed that such posts were removed due to misinformation. This response ignored the broader issue: that legitimate, well-articulated criticism is often silenced without adequate explanation or transparency.

The GM’s response was a textbook example of corporate deflection, where real issues were downplayed, and the focus shifted to dismissing player frustrations. This interaction further underscores Blizzard’s disregard for meaningful dialogue and accountability. Until Blizzard addresses these systemic failures with real transparency and action, the cycle of frustration and corporate evasion will continue.

Blizzard’s handling of botting in WoW Classic has been nothing short of disastrous. Despite numerous player reports, evidence posted on the forums, and even in-game proof of rampant bot activity, the issue continues to spiral out of control. This is no longer a minor inconvenience; it is actively degrading the game experience and economy.

The Issues:

Mass Botting is Undefended: Bots are operating openly for days or weeks without action. Many are running the same automated paths, showing clear signs of automation. Players are left wondering where Blizzard’s response is.

Reports Seem Ineffective: Players have reported the same bots repeatedly, yet they remain active. This raises serious questions about Blizzard’s enforcement process and whether reports are being reviewed at all.

Server Instability & Service Interruptions: Alongside the botting crisis, players are experiencing severe latency spikes, disconnects, and world server lag. These issues persist across multiple realms and occur regardless of ISP or personal network settings. Given the lack of communication from Blizzard, it is unclear whether these problems are being acknowledged or investigated.

Customer Support Silences Criticism: Instead of addressing the issue, Blizzard’s moderation team appears more focused on silencing players who raise concerns. Forum threads discussing botting and server issues are frequently locked or deleted, and players who speak up risk being ‘silenced’ in-game.

Automation Hypocrisy: Players who attempt to use WeakAura-based solutions to streamline bot reporting are punished, while botting itself continues unchecked. This sends a clear message: Blizzard does not want an effective reporting system.

What We Demand from Blizzard

Acknowledge the Problem - Publicly and Honestly: The silence from Blizzard on these issues is deafening. The botting problem is not a minor inconvenience; it is a fundamental failure of moderation, enforcement, and game integrity. The ongoing server instability only compounds the frustration. Does Blizzard even recognize the severity of these issues, or is the current state of the game considered acceptable? Probably the latter given how the investors and earning reports seem to run anything, but conjecture until they deign to actually respond to legitimate criticism.

Provide Meaningful Transparency: What exactly happens when players report bots? Are these reports reviewed by a human, or are they filtered into an automated system that is fundamentally ineffective? Why do blatant bots remain active for weeks despite thousands of reports? The current enforcement process appears either broken or nonexistent—players deserve to know which it is.

Commit to Real Action, Not Just PR Statements: Players are tired of vague, corporate-friendly assurances that botting is being “monitored” or that action is “ongoing.” If Blizzard has a plan to address botting, prove it. Show us tangible, measurable steps being taken, real enforcement, mass bans with evidence, and visible disruption to botting operations. If no such plan exists, Blizzard needs to explain why it is unwilling or unable to fix the problem.

Stop Silencing the Community for Pointing Out Your Failures: Deleting threads and muting players who call attention to these problems does not make them go away. It only reinforces the perception that Blizzard cares more about optics than actually fixing the game. Instead of treating criticism as something to be suppressed, start treating it as what it is, players demanding accountability for a paid product.

5 Likes

Holy wall of text Batman!

Was this written by a bot

1 Like

Can I get a bot to read this for me?

1 Like

If you would like to join one of the many active threads about maint, or other complaints, feel free. Blizzard mods do tend to remove redundant threads.

The other thing that is frowned on is using something like ChatGPT to create a post instead of genuinely writing them yourself. If this is the same thing you posted, then it likely got removed for spam.

This will also be removed, probably.

  • Posting about removed threads/posts
  • reposting removed content

Also, the anti-cheat detection and bans are handled by the Hacks team, not the CS folks who answer tickets. Tickets are mostly for billing and account issues. GM do handle chat infractions as well.

They are not going to tell you anything about the process the hacks team uses, or anything about Blizzard’s business processes. They don’t usually have that info, and they don’t owe it to you.

I suspect they wished to use a “Sir, this is a Wendy’s” meme, but they can’t.

5 Likes

the reason why bots are not banned on the spot is
1 they are waiting for a group to hammer them
2 the bots designer can see what caused the ban and fix it
3 time on charge backs form ebay or paypal.

nothing can be fixed about that
ddos servers breaking ect

1 Like

Speaking of, something seems to be up right now, again.

1 Like

this post reeks of chat gpt.

3 Likes

well i dont know how good is it but chat gpt zero has it at 71% ai

The irony of not being able to login or post something because the services are down again is not lost on me. Its also second only to the irony of criticizing players for using ChatGPT to construct their messages—while Blizzard continues to rely on pre-formed, repetitive responses—it is hard to ignore. Using ChatGPT to present a more cohesive and cogent message shouldn’t be dismissed, especially when compared to the generic templated replies that GMs often use. This double standard undermines meaningful engagement with the player base and highlights the lack of genuine communication.

“The Hacks Team Handles Detection, Not CS”:
It’s understandable that the hacks team handles anti-cheat detection and bans, but it’s frustrating that this division of labor is used as an excuse to avoid providing transparency on the process. This lack of information leaves players in the dark about how decisions are made. Transparency and communication are vital for maintaining trust within the community. Simply saying “we don’t owe you this information” is dismissive and creates an environment where players feel their concerns are not being taken seriously. It would be far more productive to offer some general guidelines or insights into how anti-cheat works, without revealing proprietary details, to assure players that issues like botting and cheating are actively being addressed.

DDoS Attacks on Blizzard Servers: You mentioned server issues due to DDoS attacks, which is a valid concern. However, it’s important to note that Blizzard is a multi-billion-dollar company with global infrastructure designed to handle much larger threats. Other billion-dollar companies, including those handling far more sensitive and valuable data than Blizzard (e.g., financial institutions or tech giants), also face cyberattacks but manage to prevent widespread disruptions much more effectively. The frequency and impact of these attacks on Blizzard servers could be significantly reduced with more advanced and coordinated infrastructure in place. The current state of the game’s server issues suggests a lack of preparedness and innovation to safeguard against these attacks. I have no qualms walking anyone with a background in offensive/defensive security or global software management in a Discord thread and show how other billion dollar healthcare, tech, and finance companies are able to provide 5-9 (99.999%) uptime.

Ignoring the Actual Problems: The irony here is undeniable: Blizzard acknowledges the presence of issues and complaints but focuses on redirecting players to irrelevant threads instead of directly addressing the underlying problems. The expectation that players should not question the process is counterproductive and dismissive. Instead of creating a culture where customers are discouraged from asking questions about the state of the game, Blizzard could foster a more transparent and communicative environment by explaining what they are doing to address these concerns. Expecting players to simply “accept” issues without recourse or meaningful updates is simply asinine, especially when the company has the means to do better.

I’m not reading all of that
I’m happy for you, or whatever.

1 Like