Baine logic (spoiler)

I appreciate him returning a child to his family.

I don’t appreciate him killing his people (forsaken, his fellow hordie) in doing so.

I appreciate him granting Derek Proudmoore free will

I don’t appreciate him handing derek back to the alliance - derek who’ll potentially kill countless horde in the future, perhaps including baine’s Tauren.

As lorthemar said: it’s not his motive, but his action that was wrong (too drastic).

3 Likes

Sylvanas is by far the greatest enemy of the Horde.

3 Likes

Then “educate” me. What is the “idea” behind the Horde?

taurajo camp was a hunting camp fam

“Anything mommy Sylvanas does is right and anyone who disagrees should just join the Alliance”

A hunting camp that trained Horde forces, fam

1 Like

I don’t doubt that. But I’m not a skirt chaser. I like to use logic and my actual brain.

and it was a hunting camp, anyway thats just silly things, i don’t like sylvanas and choosed to help baine over her

Here is a hint. It is not killing horde solders and aiding our #1 enemy. If he had a problem with Sylvanus then he should have confronted her and demanded a Mak’gora on the spot. That would have been what his father would have done. That is what the horde is about. Maytbe you have hear of “Lok’tar ogar”. Might makes right and glorious battle have always been the horde’s idea of honor.

Prepare for disappointment then, because the Tauren heritage questline coming in 8.2 will almost certainly be about freeing him.

It is funny because only you people are even bringing up Sylvanas. The adults are talking about Baine here.

and knowing their taste in armor, wearing him to keep his spirit alive.

Or executing him and rising another tauren to take his place.

I recommend ETC.

seems more like you and eiry like to use ad hominem attacks and circlej*rk with like-minded people, but that’s just one man’s observation.

Baine is not an Orc. Dismissing individual cultures within the Horde, is an Alliance tactic. Stop.

The idea behind the Horde was, foremost, survival. Not of one but of ALL.
But the fact that the catalyst that set Sylvanas on the war path, was a vision that she had where “the Forsaken” were being slaughtered by the Alliance (True or not). Nothing more and nothing less. But yet, according to you, it is okay to throw away Horde bodies- for ONLY the Forsaken’s survival. At the expense of everyone else’s? And you honestly believe that this is the “idea” behind the Horde?

Another Alliance tactic, to use association fallacy in regards to Horde progression. It dismisses the struggles and hardships (and consequences) that resulted in the forming of Thrall’s Horde. There is a difference between necessity and desire. These separate the current Horde from our predecessors.

Should probably educate yourself on what an “Ad Hominem” is first.

implying that people are skirt chasers and saying they just want to bang sylvanas is an ad hominem attack, genius.

2 Likes

So, according to your lack of understanding- I Ad Hominemed myself.

Good to know. :+1:

whatshisface said people just want sylvanas and you agreed with him. now you’re backtracking. good to know :-1:

1 Like