We can, you’re gearing wrong. I dont personally play Ret but I have played with Paladins who PVE as Ret; they do not need use of Exo to do 1100 DPS, and while this is short of the insanity that is Warriors, not much other than mage can keep up with Warriors.
During early P2 of WoW Classic 2019, as a long-term Paladin player (usually as an alt or second main), I rolled a Paladin, and Alliance for the first time. Anyway, I was really surprised at just how many people were playing Ret paladins.
It seems like it’s an incredibly popular class/spec combination in WoW Classic, even considering that its raw DPS output is less than some other class/spec combinations in WoW Classic raid settings.
And maybe understand there might be people who actually want a fresh experience that’s mostly authentic. But screw them right? Those people don’t matter.
You’re absolutely right, they didn’t. The playerbase created this issue. It’s nature vs nurture. Nature is we could do all of this with any class we could get our hands on, ret or otherwise because the game was designed to work that way. Nurture is the playerbase and their parsing cancer telling everyone it has to be played this way and that only two classes matter. Boost Paladin all you want, but the problem won’t go away. Unless you out DPS or out tank a warrior, those same sweat lords are going to continue to take warrior because it’s “best” and “easy mode” And should they nerf warrior and boost Paladin? You still aren’t getting a group unless you are top DPS and can out threat that warrior which you still won’t be without absolutely breaking the class. You can’t expect the devs to fix a player created problem without the players creating a new one.