You never gave a non-sarcastic answer.
1 Like
You conveniently left out the rest:
Right and the problem is the system
1 Like
You can spam in chat and use lfg, you can avoid cross faction pve if you choose to do so. If you want a t5 item and not something lower then you have two options to choose from!
lol - I am betting 1000. Most of those orders asking for R5 in notes are cheap people.
That’s because it doesn’t mean sarcasm, Everyone except OP knows that /s is the sign of sarcasm on these forums.
2 Likes
1994? Lightweight.
The argument you are making is the same people used against the lfg system - it makes people less social cause they list a group rather than spamming chat.
Are you also against lfg?
1 Like
If a portion of players refuse to learn how to engage with the system properly, even when there’s tutorials in game, their woes are not the fault of the system but themselves.
2 Likes
that’s not an explanation of why public orders don’t allow minimum quality requests, it’s an explanation of why they’re server-limited.
you’re clearly trolling, so see ya.
2 Likes
why are you doing public orders instead of finding someone who specialized in that talent tree and doing a personal order?
Counterpoint. If public orders had a minimum quality setting, what would the point be of having personal orders? There’d be no reason to engage with a system that has you seeking out a specific crafter if you can just throw an order into the ether and let the first eligible person complete it.
This whole ask sounds like ‘path of least resistance’ to me and not so much ‘making a system better’.
3 Likes
In other words, adding a minimum setting to public orders doesnt prevent people from spamming instead, so you are fine with my suggestion
where did i make that argument? i didn’t suggest anywhere that the system is good because it makes people talk to each other. the system is good because it works fine. there is no need to create a second system that works exactly like the first one.
1 Like
If the system allows scummy behavior to occur, the problem is the system because the general public will always take the selfish inconsiderate route.
1 Like
The players are the ones permitting the scummy behavior by engaging with the system wrong and refusing to learn.
Don’t post the order to public, don’t receive low quality troll fulfillment.
It’s that shrimple.
3 Likes
Nope, can’t blame the user for using as intended.
The problem is the intent of the system.
End of story
1 Like
They aren’t if they’re posting a public order expecting to impose upon it a qualitative threshold.
3 Likes
They aren’t using as intended. They intend a minimum but are not engaging with the option
3 Likes
Why aren’t you reading the rest of the thread? The answer is in there.