And higher.
I should care why?
1 Like
How is that? Losing a random gives zero conquest currently.
8 Likes
AFKers will eventually cap out CP. Try afking to rating (and yes, I know people can get carried)
I queue only epics, I have a word pad document of over 40+ names of Bots and blizzard does nothing about them. People botting honor levels for titles, pets and mounts. Easiest place to get honor is alliance epics. Even with losses I can push 2 or 3 honor levels a day and on horde thanks to long queues barely 1.
This. Gear advantages in a competitive scene are moronic. Itâs amazing how many insecure people there are lmao. Let higher rating get you more conquest so you can finish gearing faster, but let everyone end at the same ilvl at some point.
11 Likes
Well not really. At high ratings, gear will be identical due to people being queued at roughly the same rating. If all you do is queue randoms, you shouldnât have the level of gear a high rated or mythic raider has.
Thatâs a dragon slayer wish. Not a single pvper is asking for that, even the people that it would actually earn it.
A system like that would just again put you and most others from actually getting the gear. Unique appearances mounts and the like locked behind rating is more than good enough. Gear is fleeting and mounts, tmogs, and titles persist.
Also this exists already. Itâs called get some friends and power through some 10s for a full 460 set. Doesnât get more welfare than that.
2 Likes
Games first and foremost should be fun, it seems a lot of us are saying its not fun being forced in to pve to gear for pvp, the amount of time required isnât as big an issue as being told we need to do something we just simply donât want, to be competitive in what we do want. Iâm fine with someone with high pvp ratings having slightly, though not unbalanced gear advantages. pve types should never have an advantage simply because they sink time in to raiding, imho raiding is nothing but memorizing mechanics, if I want to memorize stuff Iâll go study another branch of psychology or maybe step in to anthropology, at least it would be of interest to me 
1 Like
As it should. I donât pvp at that rating, so I donât deserve that level of gear.
I love the people that are asking for these higher ilvl for rating are people that wouldnât have even earned their pvp wpns pre mop when rating did tie with gear.
6 Likes
They should put rating back on shoulders like in Wotlk. That showed who was the better players or at least took the effort to get the rating. It made the playing field fun and engaging to work towards something every week.
Yup, thereâs tons of afkers in Alliance epics⌠probably one of the (many) factors contributing to their poor performance in epics.
And some of these guys (in âPvP gearâ threads such as this one) actually want to give good gear to these same do-nothing afkers (seems to be what theyâre arguing)⌠
Did you used to be named âSuicydollâ, by chance? I think Iâve seen you in a few epics before, if you are who Iâm thinking of.
1 Like
well your complaining about the wrong thing thenâŚ475 is 475 shouldnt matter if you got it from pve or pvp. You can get the same corruptions doing arenas as you do PvE , But you want nick pick certain items are op
I mean, elite sets kind of did at 2k lmao.
Yea, if I donât pvp at that rating, I shouldnât get what they earned.
Elite sets should be cosmetic only not power creeps. If you want more participation you need to level the field and make the goal post actually reachable.
2 Likes
Motorcycle trinket and writhing are pretty dumb, tank trinkets were dumb all xpac, and CoS gear killed itâs season.
Not even counting corruption
9 Likes
You are literally agreeing with him
1 Like
Suicydull - suicidal lol yes that was me. I got flagged and changed it to this.
1 Like