I mean you can use the time capsule app to see everytime metrics were available A52 was ahead, by alot. Your measurement method is about as accurate as trying to determine whether New York or Los Angeles has more people by standing on a street corner in each.
I have recently rerolled a character in Illidan.
Pros:
- The server population is active, way more active than Bleeding Hollow.
- You will see more than 5 people in Oribos and more than 3 in quest hubs.
- The market seems stable so far, the AH seems healthy.
Cons:
- There are a lot of spammers and trade chat is unreadable. Had to get an addon to filter trade chat.
- Not really friendly - a lot of toxicity in chats.
If you do start one in Area 52, share your experiences.
I feel like thats the best way to do it buddy.
Lol what? Time capsule app to determine which server is the most populated? No, the only way for you to see is experience yourself by compare and contrast. I have level 50-60 toons on the three servers and have made a comparison regarding the amount of people in org, how long ques take, auction house, time it takes to get mythics together etc etc⌠There is no data available that gives a fair comparison (some sites say tich, some say illidan and some say area-52). The only method that works is seeing yourself and comparing them. If you donât believe me make toons and compare them as I have and you will see.
the âbestâ way is irrelevant if itâs garbage. Itâs like being the top scorer of the dumb class.
Then dont lol, making a claim on a vastly inaccurate âbestâ method because an alternative doesnât exist is much worse than no claim.
The âbestâ way is the only way, your time capsule app is laughable and silly.
I would say this is my exact experience of Illidan which beats out the others. Thank you.
historical records are a better record than anecdotal data and have been since the modern science era.
Sure my guy, keep believing the time capsule app will give you the truth. Heâs already made his mind up end of discussion.
Yes science has made up itâs mind about how invalid anecdotal data is for making metric based claims over and over. Correct.