Well? Would you?
Not for me. 3% is absolutely pathetic. Certainly no where near enough to make me want to give up 2-4 bag slots.
2 Likes
19 Likes
Unless Blizz decides to double-down on the amount of currencies getting stuffed into our bags, yes. Going from a 34-slot bag to a 32-slot bag is nbd.
4 Likes
Nah. Also amusing that Wowhead says it’s a “first of its kind” while hunter quivers gave attack speed in addition to holding ammo.
9 Likes
Not for 3%
5 Likes
They did say bag though, which is a specific thing. Container is the general term that would include quivers.
1 Like
I have 194 bag slots on 7 characters and 196 on an 8th. We will have a warbands bank and I have a personal guild bank and a bank alt. Ill survive.
4 Likes
Yeah, it’s too bad there isn’t an older version of the game available to play in order to jog their memory either.
I’m not going to admit that I never knew that about quivers
That said, general-purpose bags with effects sound…interesting. I hope they don’t go overboard with it though, to the point where bags become part of gearing. 
2 Likes
This is currently my stance. They have had bags before that granted a nice “bonus”, but you had to give something up in order to use them. For example you could equip a higher slot herbalism bag, but it ONLY held herbs so you had to sacrifice general space for that. Same with the fishing bag, fridge, engineering, enchanting, gem bags, etc. Do you give up a bag slot just to have more of one type of storage?
In this case, 3% for my rogue won’t be a deal breaker anyway. If it is bigger than a bag an alt has, I would use it. If I had to give up slots, I probably would not. I am not doing PvP though or anything else where speed would matter.
2 Likes
Po-tay-to po-tah-to. A bag for bullets or a bag for other bags. Quivers/ammo pouches were reduced to just normal bags without the attack speed after the changes so still fits the same category overall as an item that goes in a bag slot with an extra benefit.
So then this bag really is the first bag to have a special effect, since quivers are quivers and ammo pouches are ammo pouches and both were hunter only. And when they were changed to be bags they lost their special effect according to you.
OK Sure … but your pretending like using an old quiver, completely removing an entire bag, is equivalent to giving up a couple slots. They are not the same thing.
Was more-so referring to the phrasing of them saying it was the “first of its kind” for a bag to give an extra equip effect when quivers/ammo pouches were technically the first. Because they came before the one they are talking about. Sequentially, the thing that came first would be the first of its kind. Sure, could say it is the first general-purpose bag to have an extra effect, but it wouldn’t be the first bag to do so.
I would not consider ammo pouches / quivers bags. If you made a new char in classic and your friend said “hold on fam let me craft you some bags for your new character” you definitely would not be expecting to get 4 quivers that can’t hold any actual items other than arrows
…I’m not saying that? I am saying quivers were the first items that went in the bag slot to give an equip effect. I’m not saying hunters only used quivers and didn’t use other bags.
I told you! I told all of you! “Mount equipment” was just a gimmick system to nerf the water strider and nothing else would ever be done with it. And here they are, putting effects that should be part of mount equipment on freakin’ bags, of all things.
3 Likes
nope, not a chance
With a personal bank guild on both horde and ally and bank alts running them, I have no concerns about bag space. So, to answer the question, I’ll probably use it.
And I’m saying a quiver is not a bag, as bags say “bag” on the item and quivers say “quiver”
A quiver is a bag for ammo. An herb bag is a bag for herbs. A mining bag is a bag for ore. A soul shard bag is a bag for soul shards. Excuse me, the portable hole isn’t a bag, it’s a portable hole. No, there’s no point in arguing semantics, a bag is a bag.