…I don’t know what the hell I was on about there. Gonna guess just getting off of work fried my brain slightly. 
2 Likes
You’re a restart. It’s amazing how you coped this long.
Actually it’s just pathetic.
Still on a forum alt pretending like your opinion matters, using emojis at the ripe old age of 45.
Have you lost the extra pounds yet tubs?
While I think they’re not worth the pixels their typing creates…was any of that really necessary?
Yes.
10char
Lol, none of that is true. The only thing they did was make it so you had to put a certain amount of points into a main tree before being able to put more points in other trees.
Ahh taking things out of context like the rest of the nerd ilk here.
BTW, all of it is true…
So, it stands to reason that only one of us is lying here right?
This is a pretty big jump homie. I said I appreciate how they were back in the day in a way I couldn’t when I was young, probably because as an adult I don’t read the meta and it feels cool to get a talent every level. For the record DF and MoP were my favorite trees. I’m just saying that Cata was the worst iteration imo, they were smaller and less consistent than Wrath but without the impact that MoP choices had.
The reason people should stray away from the meta. Is meta is a joke.
You don’t need that spec to clear anything. You don’t need those elixers and pots to clear content. You don’t enchants and world buffs to progress…
But because people don’t seem to have any free will anymore. Or any danglies to tell people to kiss their butt I’ll play my way.
You get an entire game that is nothing but a bunch of slaves.
Time for an uprising…
Not enchanting, gemming and reforging your gear is just you being lazy, I don’t know why you wouldn’t do those things.
2 Likes
You can be anti meta, that’s fine.
What you described is anti understanding the game and actively choosing to grief others because you think you’re somehow “not meta” for just outright not playing correctly with the in game mechanics.
Those aren’t the same.
You can run some weird non meta build if it MAKES SENSE, even if it’s not optimal. While meta is not hard set as an acronym, its representation can easily be understood as “Most Effective Tactics Available”. In short, it represents what “best” is. Everything that isn’t “best” isn’t meta, but not being meta DOES NOT inherently mean not viable.
Refusing to gem, enchant, and use consumables is not anti-meta. It’s just you being lazy and outright refusing to play the game. Not doing these things is not a strategy or tactic. It is literally just you choosing to be a detriment to those around you because you’re lazy.
You’re right. Time for an uprising of us “elitists” actually going out of our way to not only deny you groups, but to actively flame you for choosing to be a detriment in a game that requires us to work together, to the point where players like you quit and NEVER return.
You people are too lazy to socket gems correctly. You people aren’t uprising against anything.
1 Like
Pretty sure there was a way to make the point without insulting a bunch of other groups that have nothing to do with this.
…Because I don’t need to for Heroics or world content?
Another reason to avoid raids, since apparently the goal is for (at least some) people to be so toxic to others that the entirety of Koga’s Gym gets jealous.
I would argue that yes, you would need them for heroics because if you’re struggling on a boss for whatever reason you and the others having that little bit more could mean the difference between killing a boss or not.
I understand why you wouldn’t want to with you having no gold but it’s very applicable in heroics.
Ya cuz talent trees in wrath had so many viable builds… Please. 95% of the base used the same cookie cutter build.
I didn’t say anything about not gemming or enchanting.
Consumables and world buffs…
The term “meta” means the same thing as “cookie cutter”.
Means I’m too lazy or too dumb to bother trying to do it myself.
Choose one.
Sure, you didn’t explicitly say “gemming”, but I’m not apologizing for throwing it in there when you don’t use elixirs or pots, so no long buff and no short buff from the bottle, and you say no enchants or world buffs. It’s safe to say that you don’t gem either if you’re playing a version with gems.
Sure, it’s the dated version of it. Cookie cutter only refers to talents were as meta includes class and spec distinction in relation to the content being done, but sure.
Meta, Viable, Non viable, they all still need their consumables, their pots and food buffs, their gems and enchants. It’s my point entirely, these are separate from any shifting metas. They are just expectations of a player to do because these are just in game mechanics. It’s like trying to say you’re anti meta because you put 0 talent points in and won’t be apart of the system. No, that isn’t anti meta, it’s just a refusal to use the in game mechanic. Just like how not gemming, enchanting, or using consumables is not anti meta, it’s just anti playing the game.
Yes.
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.