We are discussing a fantasy version of Succubi whose specific design and function grew out of a misogynist mindset of a company that is now being taken to court for their sexist practises.
doesnt matter who designed it if people of differing genders enjoy it. a male photographer can take a centerfold for a male mag but non binary and lesbians can also enjoy it.
Get a life and I mean this in the kindest way. What you are saying here in general is if a women looks sexy it’s inherently sexist, and that is flat out dumb, stupid, asinine as hell.
You need to get off the computer and visit a museum, better yet communicate with actual people and share your takes. Look at us in Canada, I can go topless, my choice, does that make me inherently sexist to have the same option as a man does? No.
Your offense is frightening, and frankly I am so tired of being told by the likes of forum trolls as a whole that my existing is sexist and to cover up. Oddly enough I wouldn’t doubt you are the same crowd that has issues with the burqa. Women are entitled to equal rights, but not if it makes men randy? Why not teach society that a person is not their clothing? No instead we censor the same things women fought for throughout history.
I keep saying this, why keep paying whilst so offended? Why now when actual voices need to be heard? Pushing your agenda so important to silence the voice of actual victims?
No, the Succubus is not being removed. However she is being redesigned to be unattractive and instead of charming the enemy she will distract them by complaining about the price of lawn chairs that were supposed to be on sale and demanding to see the raid boss.
No, that is not what I am saying. It is not even close to what I am saying. Please go back and read what I actually said as opposed to your interpretation of it.