Are fire mages over the top or do ele shaman just lag behind

Thank you maladath finally someone who has a clue

2 Likes

I don’t agree and there’s no way to quantify that statement and using arena is not a good barometer. Been playing since Vanilla so it’s not like I’m new to mages.

Ok then look at raiding from vanilla to now and tell me 2 raid tiers were mages were sat because all 3 specs were underperforming.

1 Like

Please point to where I’m saying mages were\are bad. Do I believe they’re a favorite of blizz, nope. Does that mean my opinion is right and yours is wrong? Not at all, just a difference of opinion.

Yes it is just a matter of opinion, so when you discuss those you have to use the information available.
In this case where mage is located in the meta for pve and pvp.

They are the only class in both pve and pvp where they weren’t part of the top tier in at least one of their specs, in some cases all 3.

I understand difference of opinions, but you are arguing popularity and mage has always been on top.

3 Likes

Actually I’m arguing that GPY doesn’t need to be removed. I gave my opinion about blizz favoring mages, not right or wrong just an opinion.

I’m stating it and will continue but I’m making it clear it’s my opinion while others are acting as if their opinions are a fact. Not much being said in this forum is actual fact especially when it comes to which class is OPed and which spells need to be tweaked or removed.

I guarantee you’ll have the exact opposite opinion from someone.

I didn’t say anything about g pyro btw. That was someone else

I am not killshotjr, that’s what yall were talking about. I have already said what I think about gpyro and don’t feel like doing it again for the 100th time.

However you said in your words that you dont think blizz favors mage, that is what you are discussing with me.

I understand this. However I support my arguement with the facts we can use. If you dispute the logic and conclusion that is fine, but to simply say it’s just my opinion then why say anything at all if you wont or cant elaborate.

5 Likes

I know. I was referencing the hunter

I honestly don’t think it’s a conscious favoritism at this point.

Since MoP ended they’ve done this “SPEC FANTASY” garbage where they take everything away from people except iconic abilities and then shove Diablo 3 design into the holes they made.

Mage and Rogue retained a lot of their toolkit because that’s what they’re known for. High control and high burst damage, they’re the most talked about analyzed classes with maybe warlock joining in.

It’s easy to understand rogue, mage, and lock fantasy since they’ve been in the spotlight forever.

Meanwhile…
hurrdurr arms spinnyspin mortal strike, paladin make immune for short time, dk big dmg monk punchy punch kicky kick haha

Yes I’m still mad about WoD arms.

1 Like

That’s the problem. You can provide all the anecdotal evidence you like but that doesn’t mean it’s a fact. So even if I did it highly unlikely anyone would change their opinion on matters. Most just aren’t built that way

All I’m doing is stating my opinion and not trying to convince anyone else that I’m right and they’re wrong. If I wanted to debate or prove my point I would but I don’t. It doesn’t mean I shouldn’t offer it up. It also means I shouldn’t be insulted for offering it up either (not you).

I’ve killed more than a couple fire mages on my baby ele shaman.

*Granted it was probably because they are an even crappier pvper than I am.

I can easily see this being the case. Its a wizard, like the staple of fantasy.

I didnt say it was a fact, nor implied it is one.

If you dont want to discuss or debate the point is fine. Leave it at that.

I don’t think you know what this means. I am not using my own personal experience (which what anecdotal evidence is) I am using the numbers of representation and performance strength of the class in past to now.
Then using that information to come to a logical conclusion.
If one class is always strong and doing well in every aspect of the game and no other class can say the same, then it’s a reasonable conclusion.

Not saying its not reasonable to believe otherwise.

2 Likes

But the context at what you’re using it is trying to prove something that can’t be proven from those numbers. Mages being good, great fantastic the greatest doesn’t == blizz favor. Your opinion is because they’re be high in the meta means it’s irrefutable proof of said favor.

You mean your conclusion. I mean you could be right but unless blizz came out and said we favor mages, we’ll never actually know and people will have many different opinions and conclusions.

Lets just say we agree to disagree

Maybe blizzard doesn’t favor them, but how else do you explain it

This I am fine with doing.

:handshake:

2 Likes

That’s not completely accurate. It’s not necessarily one’s own personal experience.

an¡ec¡do¡tal

/ˌanəkˈdōdl/

adjective

  1. (of an account) not necessarily true or reliable, because based on or consisting of reports, observations, or personal accounts of usually unscientific observers rather than facts or research.

Anecdotal evidence is evidence from anecdotes : evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony. (note: personal testimony in this context is not specifically just your own)

Anecdotal evidence is a body of information based on accounts and narrative. The term suggests weak evidence based on examples and personal accounts as opposed to information that is statistically significant. Word of mouth, rumor mills, cherry picking, and confirmation bias are all examples of using anecdotal evidence that are not necessarily one’s own personal experience.

The term anecdotal evidence is often used in research papers to highlight unreliable information that may be used as a starting point for more rigorous investigation.

2 Likes

thumbs up

Ghostcrawler after leaving ages ago stated there was a lot of favouritism for them by the many on the dev teams. Said it made it extremely hard to try and get them to balance them.
You can see this throughout the patch notes over the course of the game. Usually anytime an op dmg ability got nerfed, some other dmg ability would be buffed to compensate. Leading to no real change.

But favouritism is natural, everyone is going to do it. The problem is the longer it goes on, the hard it is to reign in. Because it then becomes the norm, what people have gotten used to. So then any small adjustments feel like massive nerfs.

1 Like