You’re controlling the narrative here; pro-rdf do the same, and claim they’re the majority in and out of the forums. I’ve also explain why they might be the vocal majority in the forums.
They’re controlling the narrative as well; we have other features that weren’t there at the release of WotLK. I don’t agree with those statements.
It went up by 500k, RDF wasn’t the only feature/content that promoted that. Why aren’t you considering the 11.5mil prior RDF release? Why not analyze the possibility that RDF was a factor that contributed to that fall in subs? When you take losses as they did back then, you have to analyze every aspect of it. Sometimes, people want to attribute RDF to that push in subs, which lacks total validity, since it didn’t prevent decrease in subs.
Those are the only facts you want to accept. Why aren’t you even willing to analyze the social impacts it had? What are these checked proven real facts? All I’ve seen is “I’m not willing to put any effort into put a group together” and “LFG is empty”.
You didn’t even touch the ones I quoted.
Edit:
Not only are you invalidating other people’s experiences, but you are pushing the issue in a non-related thread. Who’s controllig the narrative?