That’s exactly what you have done!
I look back on the past and clearly see that it doesn’t work and destroys the longevity of the game. You just want it cause you want it. Who is exactly operating from emotions lol?
3 Likes
Lol no dude, it’s about the original Classic project, that’s why they say 2006, and not the future expansions.
Clearly your perception of the past is not correct, LFD was a very welcome change to the game and did nothing but help players out.
I mean you’re so anti Retail yet defend a Retail LFG tool, not sure what to say tbh.
6 Likes
I see you still dont understand who blizzard made classic, tbcc, and now wotlkc for.
The playerbase who didnt like the direction retail took. The path of convenience over community started with rdf. They are trying to make classic have the oldschool mmorpg design of community over convenience, where you are supposed to interact with the community instead of relying on a convenience tool to get everything done.
8 Likes
Just want to let you know you are dealing with a long time forum troll that has a backlog of alts that he uses to start flame wars on the forum.
3 Likes
He can make a 1000 alts, i’ll make him delete them all
2 Likes
I agree…sort of. My plan for Wrath was to have a bunch of alts and grind dungeons for character progression. Now, with no RDF, that doesn’t seem feasible. Now, I’ll probably level my main and an alt. After that, who knows?
1 Like
Until you answer that I’m not responding to you anymore.
They didn’t decide to wake up and make the game for a specific playerbase lol, they made it to recreate the old game which they are failing at by removing key features for the original game.
Lol ok, somehow my post is creating a flame war. Hilarious, this is coming from the person who insults everybody irrationally on the forums.
1 Like
This guy literally made a thread about how he hates tanks because he grouped with one that had a physical disability and they wouldn’t pull fast enough in Scarlet Monastery.
4 Likes
Lmao what? The tank never had a physical disability, you made that up on that thread too. Dear god, this post is like a beacon for all the trolls to come.
1 Like
Why is this post flagged? Sure its a controversial opinion but I don’t see anything reportable about it.
1 Like
Because OP had made multiple threads stating the exact same thing.
2 Likes
Oh didn’t know
1 Like
It’ll get unflagged, its the same people that flag every RDF post because it defeats all of their arguments. They know they can’t debate it out so they just spam report lol.
Wrong the other thread provided data and an experiment about the tweet the Dev made, but yeah I guess if RDF is a topic you hate seeing you’ll flag it anyways .
1 Like
You HAVE no argument! That’s the issue lol
2 Likes
Ignoring words does not make your point stronger, look a little harder and you’ll see a lot of valid points that many support.
1 Like
Apparently it’s the community that has no idea that WoW itself was built on convenience and QoL upgrades. RDF is a Wrath feature, and Wrath Classic should have Wrath features.
The antiRDF crowd love abusing the report system.
5 Likes
The other thread you made was to advocate RDF being put in the game. There is literally no reason why you couldn’t add this to your existing thread except to forcibly clutter the forums with your opinions.
1 Like
I actually later on said they weren’t trolls and I was wrong to say that, actually I even said that directly to you lmao.
1 Like
I’m just explaining the most likely reason this thread was flagged as spam.