Some cheeses are too squishy for cheese racing.
you can never have too much cheese
no.
the only time old threads get manually locked, is when someone necros them.
information becomes outdated.
when itâs outdated, itâs no longer relevant.
you may THINK itâs the same problem, but when it comes to bugs etc, just because itâs happening under similar circumstances, doesnât mean itâs the same bug.
it depends on the environment.
and yes, a lot of IT stuff is outdated within the span of a year.
soft cheeses donât need to be excluded from sport.
replace peanut butter with feta?
âŚjust as long as we donât then get a penalty for âduplicate threadsâ when the old thread has been dead this long.
thanks for the idea, I took you up on it a month later
Are you two doing ok? Iâm a little worry because itâs been awhile and you havenât checked in with usâŚ
I couldnât agree more bruddah!
You may not reply to old, outdated info or irrelevant threads, but there are plenty of people that do
I think one month after the most recent reply would be good. I wouldnât want to see an active thread locked a month after the first response.
Edit:
Saw this. That sounds good. Either would be plenty of time.
Now why would you go and quote a blue and draw their attention to this?
Why not? I didnât even notice the blue response until after I originally posted.
That could be useful. Can you also do a manual lock, so you could lock older threads when a new patch or expansion came out?
Thread title, your post 4 months laterâŚ
The irony.
No irony intended here, I agreed with what OP said.
Iâll necro until the say they give me a necromancer class for real⌠a caster undead master
Hereâs one that you should leave alone because it is now our official time capsule.
This thread will now be the official GD time capsule. Hello to the future! Hope weâll all still be here!
They donât like necro posts because it shows how much has not been fixed or addressed.
I was actually just discussing this with a colleague yesterday. We didnât immediately agree on the right timeframe for a thread to close after its last post, but it seems like 60 or 90 days is more than enough time.
Since this thread is brought back, I just want to say that I am in support of ânecro postingâ rather than creating a new thread if itâs the same topic.
The forum just needs to be consistent with directing people to ânewâ posts in the thread and people should be aware of posting dates so they can choose which posts they want to reply to.
Also, certain posts, no matter how old, could be useful to respond to, like if theyâre an unanswered question. Someone else with the same question could see the new response.
They donât like necro posts because it shows how much has not been fixed or addressed.
Partially true imo. Thereâs a section water texture in a river that is outfight deleted in Hillsbrad for like the last 5+ years. Imagine a river and then water goes poof for a chunk and then magically reappears and continues on. Its stupid stuff like this that never. ever. gets fixed because the bean counters at blizz hq refuse to authorize any dev time on anything that isnât affecting current expac. This is how great games die.
Its stupid stuff like this that never. ever. gets fixed because the bean counters at blizz hq refuse to authorize any dev time on anything that isnât affecting current expac. This is how great games die.
Not sure it is just money. Remember we have been told time and time again that devs donât interact with the customer, the use cs reps (forum blues) to get them information and if the cs rep does not care about the topic, it never gets passed along.
You may not reply to old, outdated info or irrelevant threads, but there are plenty of people that do
Removing forum functionality for people who are smart enough to use it properly because of a few bad apples who arenât able to read isnât the answer.
This thread is a great example of a post that a lot of people suggest shouldâve been auto-locked, yet there are still relevant conversations going. If any of the recent responses made a new threadâas some people suggest is betterâit wouldâve been wholly unnecessary and, more importantly, lost the flow of the conversation within this thread (and probably not gotten responses).