So because I don’t agree with you all is lost?
Why is getting a full accurate representation of Vanilla World of Warcraft a bad thing? Isn’t that what people wanted?
If Blizzard came out and said they were doing progressive AV, would you guys still be here arguing against that, despite it being the most accurate thing they could have done?
I’m trying to figure out your red line in the sand that if Blizzard crosses, you won’t play. Because I want everyone to play. But I also want it to be accurate.
I’ve seen several folks offer up 1.8 as a compromise. What if we started with that?
Right now we’re at 1.12 - 1.12 for Classic.
If we can get to X - 1.12 then that would be beneficial to you guys who are arguing against me.
Then just maybe, when they flip the switch to the older version, people will dislike it Blizzard will decide to keep the one of the older versions.
As I think Prufinnor has stated, I haven’t played the older version. So I can’t argue against it. And I haven’t been arguing against it. Never said it was bad. I’d prefer if they started with it and then progressed.
If a majority of people like the older version maybe they’ll stick with the older version.
But right now I think it would be best to do X - 1.12, if Blizzard can do it. If not, then well, we’re stuck with 1.12 because that’s what they have.
Also really surprised none of you have used the Epic Battlegrounds argument. Incase you aren’t aware… Blizzard actually buffed Alterac Valley a few months ago on live.
Here is the thread. Unsure why no one is throwing this in their faces, to show that the current live time is trying to go back to a time AV was harder. When that exact time is, I’m unsure.