Also, of course Blizzard make decision that generates revenue, it’s a business. That’s how business work. If they ever get a clear business case that RDF could drive revenue, I have no doubt they will implement it.
In the meantime, I was making a hypothetical discussion around compromise for RDF seeing how it’s absence is literally ruining the entire expansion for some people…
Except it is. You said I was 100% wrong when I said pro-RDF is unwilling to compromise. But you failed to read the very first post from someone who is pro-RDF, unwilling to compromise, and has more likes than the OP.
This is what we call proof Tesalyn.
So you linked yet another pro-RDF poster saying that the’yre unwilling to compromise with the new tool, and it got 400 likes, and you think this is helping you?
Tesalyn, you are further proving my point! This isn’t fun if I don’t get to defend my point myself. You are literally giving us proof that pro-RDF is unwilling to compromise meanwhile anti-RDF is.
Based off all the evidence I’ve linked you that you continue to ignore. Also based off of all the evidence you’ve linked yourself.
The other one was two different threads by the same person. The other ones you can’t say conclusively if they are pro-RDF or anti-RDF. You don’t know their alignment. Just like you didn’t know Confidence’s.
Please do! I would appreciate you proving yourself wrong more.
Link what exactly?
Quote where I have ever claimed this. I’ll wait.
Someone that understands how statistics, the player base, and Warcraftlogs works.
You linked my thread as a source for him, lmao, self checkmate.
Secondly, logic can be used in an argument as ridiculous as RDF/Anti RDF, you don’t need some peer reviewed study or “official statement”. People have totally just forgotten about making rational arguments. “SOURCES SAY DROPPED OBJECTS FALL UPWARDS”, well I’ll be! Guess gravity works upwards if someone makes an official statement claiming so
You are. On other threads. You and that LFG dude (who looks like got suspended btw).
You dismiss every poll saying it’s not true. You haven’t provided a single source to back it up, except for saying it’s false.
It’s actually hilarious to me. Feel sorry for you mate. Good luck out there.
Big mouth. Zero proof.
I wasn’t proven wrong.
You said that only pro RDF are unable to compromise. I said it’s BS.
Because pro RDF can compromise. Just because 3 or 5 out of 50 threads are by anti-RDF, doesn’t prove me wrong. If anything, it proves me point that more pro-RDF are willing to compromise.
I’m done with you.
Welcome to ignore.
You’re yet to link a single source to back up the claim that more people are against RDF.
It baffles me how people can be anti-rdf yet not see a single issue with people being able to use pvp queues as the new rdf. Everyone who is pro RDF will most likely end up sitting in the city afk queueing for BGs instead of dungeons.