This “no you” childish behavior coming from you is getting old.
More false claims. This is all you do Hirav, you dig yourself into a hole and then act like an immature child.
1 Like
Just because you didn’t understand it, doesn’t make it false.
You lack the knowledge to fully realize it.
This is such nonsense. If you don’t provide anything there is nothing to understand.
There is nothing to fully realize. You can’t even provide proof. But you know that. It’s why you are dodging and stalling. This is your classic behavior.
1 Like
You don’t recognize the provision, because you didn’t understand it.
These excuses are boring. You have nothing to provide, therefor there is nothing to understand. Once again you make false claims and then gaslight and dodge to avoid backing up your claim.
1 Like
I already provided it, multiple times. You didn’t understand it, so you ignored it.
Incorrect. Enough lies.
1 Like
That’s a positive claim. You have the burden of proof to prove the claim.
Nope, you made the claim. Stop with the childish BS. It’s just plain boring.
1 Like
What claim did I make again?
You know what one it is, I’m not going to say it because you will use it as “proof”.
1 Like
Because it is proof, that you don’t understand.
There is no proof, that’s why you refuse to provide it.
1 Like
I already provided it. I keep providing it and you still don’t understand it. Thus you don’t know that I have provided it.
Nope you just keep saying I don’t understand. You claimed I said something I did not. The funnies part in this is you don’t even understand your own claim, you spew so much BS you have lost yourself if your own sauce. Sad honestly.
1 Like
Because you clearly do not understand. Thus you do not know that I have already and continue to provide it.
This is that insane rant I was waiting for, your so lost in your own BS you can’t even get your story straight. Read carefully, you claimed I said something I did not say, provide the proof of me saying what you claimed I said.
1 Like
The only time I said the words ‘you said’ was here:
Do you see the ‘if’ there? That means I don’t believe you actually said it.
But you clearly said that you know how algorithms work:
Even though you don’t in the slightest. You don’t even have inert knowledge of how they work.
Ahh yes more examples of you knowing things but not understanding them.
and once again you use things out of context. You would make a great left wing news caster.
1 Like
So, you do know how algorithms work?
Not just what they do, but how they work?