There’s a difference between making a good argument and a bad argument for what you believe in. A bad argument will only empower those who argue against you and enable them to feel more assured in their opposing beliefs.
Thanks to someone else making some decent arguments I have actually begun leaning towards 1.5AV.
1.5 AV is an experience that was unique to vanilla warcraft and one that we can no longer attain thoroughly without relying on the use of PSs that likely use incorrect codes and have a form of AV that does not hold true to the original 1.5 AV.
One of the largest concepts that made Vanilla Warcraft something great was that it took time, effort and evolved various forms of difficulty that arise from simple coding. Going with the more streamlined 1.12 version of AV is going against that. Comparing the differences between 1.5 and 1.12 is akin in various ways to comparing Classic to Current. 1.5 being slower and giving a more difficult feeling while 1.12 rewarding the concept of zerg rushing and getting everything done quickly.
Many have argued that we can just force turtles in AV. Do you argue that we should allow flight as well? Because that is the very same argument that pro-flight players make. “You can just not fly” Given the ability to use something the players will be forced by their own mental state to use what they are given rather than break away and try to replicate what would effectively make the game better. Current wow would be much more fun if it were more difficult and slower to get through everything, but next to no one ever does the things that would help produce such results simply because “why not take advantage of the tools you have?”.
Besides. How often have we heard arguments from people who experienced 1.5 AV that it was a terrible form? Sure you could argue that at the time people may have complained while playing the game. Just like someone is going to complain about having to make 100 gold by level 40, that complaint is a current thought that will go by and be forgotten later. Real issues are not forgotten. They stand and they will be used to remind others. So has anyone come out with real issues about 1.5 AV?
So what are the real problems with doing 1.5 AV?
It will take longer to make, yes that is true. I was one of the few in a recent thread that noticed that they stated in the recent blizzcon that coding was lost between patches due to the way they worked during Vanilla. This sadly means that 1.5 AV data could be all but gone now. That is a “could” not a guarantee. So we should be asking Blizzard if they have the data to sculpt 1.5 AV or not. And if not then if they have enough vanilla evidence to thoroughly replicate 1.5 AV.
Blizzard will try to do this as cheaply and easily as possible, likely. Using 1.12 AV is much easier for Blizzard to create. That is true. But lowering our expectations and just accepting what Blizzard says to make it easier on them is EXACTLY what the anti-vanilla/classic forumers did. What did those of us who argued for vanilla servers for so long do? We argued for something that would take time, work and effort to be done. To simply give in now, when we have these final chances is laughable. We have classic coming now, this is a chance to let Blizzard know exactly what we want.
I feel if the community is more supportive of a 1.5 AV then they will give in like they did with Classic. Arguing that just because they will likely take the easy route is silly. We should be arguing for what we WANT, not just what we will ACCEPT. Simple as that. Let’s make this game the best version of vanilla as possible. We want Classic Vanilla experience. I feel that 1.5 AV better represents that than 1.12. 1.12 might have had more players experiencing it, but at that point AV was already being streamlined to be an easier and faster BG. That is not what we want with Vanilla.