Mr. CaptainJack,
I would like to express my viewpoint that your recent statements may not accurately capture the situation. You have suggested that I lack firsthand experience and have inquired about the submission of images to support your argument. Today, I encountered several players with MMR ratings exceeding 4900. Allow me to share the names of these individuals: Team 1 comprised Logos, Corsaire, Darkmansbuddy, and Sprenter, with an average MMR of 4100. Team 2 consisted of XIL0veUn0obX, DireRaven, Rainy, and ThirdDay. average of 4900. I lost 170 MMR ^^
I would like to request that you refrain from defending the game with which we are engaged. My contention is that such defense might inadvertently exacerbate the issues at hand. It is important to consider that I have engaged in over 100 games, thus affording me a comprehensive understanding of the prevailing dynamics. Additionally, a friend of mine, who operates within the same gaming environment, has been able to sustain a positive winning streak while maintaining an MMR of approximately 5300. Remarkably, this player consistently finds themselves aligned with more proficient teammates. This observation prompts me to underscore the notion that victories should rightfully favor those who excel, while defeats should appropriately fall upon those who perform less competently.
My primary contention pertains to what I perceive as a flawed matchmaking system. In my personal experience, I find myself frequently partnered with players of inferior skill, which consequently necessitates me to navigate and strive to succeed within a challenging framework. This imbalance within the team composition is, in my estimation, further aggravated by the absence of rectification measures to ensure a balanced and engaging gameplay experience. Such asymmetry has even resulted in instances of player abandonment due to the perception of an inequitable MMR allocation.
In conclusion, I kindly request that you cease advocating for the game’s current state, as my perception is that these actions might inadvertently perpetuate a sentiment of complacency among the player base. It is my belief that these circumstances warrant a genuine review and remedy. I trust that this elucidation resonates with you, serving to underscore the urgency of addressing these matters.
so don´t try to defend them ^^
I just want to add one thing, which is why I’m editing once again. I recently played a match, and I won, but strangely I was given a loss. How can the game even be remotely considered good under such circumstances? In my opinion, players should receive refunds, and the game should not be sold in stores.
Sincerely,