Dear Blizzard

General Discussion
1

(first off english isn’t my first langauge if i miss-spell some words here am not apologizing for it)

Dear Blizzard. what are you doing. giving classic game just re-paint isn’t worth price your asking for. you could done so much more with this project but you didn’t. new paint job doesn’t justify 40-70 dollar video game. this game was released long time ago. you warcraft 3 purest out their thinks nothing new needs be added to game released in stone age. your wrong. times have changed people have changed what people find as fun have changed. buying game people already played two death. is only pleasing older generation offering nothing new two younger generation. people gonna pick this up play it for maybe 1-2 months stop playing it.

so ask you people is this game work paying the amount blizzard is asking for no. hell no. is this a quality upgrade to blizzard classic no. they need offer more then this. like

some people may not agree with this but really don’t care. blizzard could of used diablo-isk item generation with respawnable monster camps. with white/green/blue/red like items. and their stats randomly generated. that way no item you find is ever the same. and player has more item consumption this could be great for pvp. making warcraft 3 less like starcraft more like warcraft 3.

adding more objectives in pvp muitiplayer - every notice that in these type of games 2v2 or 3v3 games dont have competitive scene. they should fix this where objective of the games aren’t destroying your enemies bases right away but capture objectives . or excorting something offering different modes of pvp then classic melee. these games end quick it normally is who every builds the fasted harsesses normally 1v1 game good cause show spot lights action ppl enjoy to watch. in 2v2-4v4 melee games its prue chaos. thing this needs be addressed so yes think adding new way use these mode compatitive mode would be great instead doing this over and over again. look alot things draw inspiration from look at capture the flag. look at wow warsong glutch … you could make enemies bases undestructionable only thing is destructable is units/heros only heros capture the flag bring it back home. if players capture 15-30 so flags they win or who every captures then most with 30 mins is winner.

their is a game people play on starcraft 2 that blizzard could use as could be really good witht his concept. however inventing new ways to pvp is good idea. specially what this game to last

storymode talent tree gives your player passives and bonus stats allow you challange harder differculties. add harder differculties you unlock by beating story mode. gives more achievements . have beat casual mode try normal mode have beat normal mode to try hard mode. so on there are some things diablo starcraft. wow and overwatch did right. you could use

having new game + opinion so story hero keeps all items he has finds better. instead starting a fresh with nothing doing same story and challanges all over again with ai that down right retarded offers you no challange at all. if don’t think ai is dumb clearly didnt see human tower rushes. hard mode in classic warcraft 3. ai has retard level of play style - whole point playing against harder ai is better yourself. get good. get reckt until you get good keep the player interested. if ppl beat this game on hard mode too quickly lose interest quickly

that goes to second point… making ai better Hard Mode + ai should play like a pro given even most vetern player hardiest of challenges. darksouls level hard too. i mean also add random effects like infernal randomly dropping in middle of fight stuff like that. some people who do enjoy the sick challange

then theirs people who like please dont add new units. am like yes please your making us pay full game amount of money for a repaint job and ability to play as female death knight. no its not worth it. this is lazy at best. not trying be harsh when say this blizz get your act together or least new heros

again some warcraft 3 purist be like no :frowning: i dont want anything “NEW” in pre-historic game been beaten to death like new horse

what about rewards about bout gaining bonus’s by completing in game achievements. like gain 100 + starting gold cause beat mission without losing single unit or new picture or icon

wanna see really good remaster - play resident evil 2 remake or resident evil 1 remake. these are great showing you how a remaster/re-work should be made. took everything that was in first one. and made it better 100% better

this glorified re-paint or re-skin isn’t it. look blizz i love you this why am telling you this supported you for over 25 years am thankful all hard work you put in. even thou capcom is different came company then you this is total different type of game. when are you gonna love us back. when are you gonna stop letting activision or who ever control your stuff. these reworks are like a love letter to everyone thats supported you over the years.

thing is we know you cna do better thats what hurts then most. you can but you wont

10 Likes
2

Hey :slight_smile:

First of all basically you are right. Just a reskin may be not worth 40-70 €/$

now they Second of all :slight_smile:

Blizzard released patches due the reforged plans. So it has Impact on WC3 Classic and Reforged.

They made new Voice Lines. New Models. New Cutscenes and changes in Singleplayer Missions.

I for myself think this stuff is money worth.

And if you do’nt want to spend this money. Play your old Warcraft 3. You can play with all the reforged players as sonn as it releases. You got thesame balance patches.

If you don’t think it’s his money worth, don’t buy it. You still can cancel the Pre-Purchase.

If you see, oh with the release/after the release they added and changed so much. You still can buy it :slight_smile:

+100 Starting Gold, especially in Multiplayer will never happen. It’s an advantage. A big one. This takes a bir from the competitive.

Sure everyone can have 100G+ but playing a mission everytime therefor… no one would have fun doing this after every match.

If it’s for the Singleplayer I don’t care. There can you have this Gold.

Adding new Units, is very hard to balance. It will change tactics and Meta’s, Heero Combos and so on. Maybe it will happen, or new heroes will be added. But this will and hsould take a very very long time for every single Unit.

Thats nothing you just can add over night. Problem is, it could make some units useless. and thats why people do not want New Units. Maybe the NE’s onlx go for the New Units and no more for different tactics. (Yeah i know atm Dryad/Bear is the only one in the Proscene Mid/Lategame)

It is not a Purist thing. Just a very risky and Gamechanging thing.

At the Moment every race is supposed to have Units for Tactics and COuntertactics to everything the enemy throws at them.

And every Race have strenght and weaknesses. A race without Weakness is superior and that would be bad.

Thats why it is unlikly with new Units.

5 Likes
3

they added additional content free of charge but, gender changed heroes is not free, new units is.

4

You have a lot of valid points.
I agree with much of what you say.

5

Your post makes zero sense from any standpoint.

  1. Harder AI? Difficult to implement. Basically Co-op. Difficult to implement.
  2. Objectives in 2v2? Lulwut.
  3. New units? Lulwut.
  4. +100 gold at the start for achievements? I don’t understand what I’m looking at.
8 Likes
6

Stopped reading here. You don’t understand how RTS is balanced. This game has trouble just balancing four races.

5 Likes
7

I wouldn’t mind if this game was just a reskin if… well you know… it didnt look like dogsh!t.

8
1 Like
9

2v2 and 4v4 doesn’t have a competitive scene. look at star-craft most competitive game play is 1v1. reason is cause they are “melee maps” it is hard point out spotlights in 2v2 basic game. watch really shouldn’t be the case. inventing new ways to pvp or player vs player in rts isn’t bad

like this having a new form of pvp in rts game is not bad idea . having new competitive scene where 2v2s or 4v4s actually fit in. instead lulwut. think misunderstanding what am actually trying to say.

here is good example -> in league of leagues their is games like aram and normal game yes under their two different games but having two different moods

Objectives may or may be good depending how they impediment - like killing level11 monster gives your whole team 500g however fighting it by yourself isn’t possible.

1 Like
10

This game needs match again with the graphics of The Culling demo from Blizzcon2018. Now the beta 2019 are missing reflections, lighting, shaders, shadows, trees, day and night reflections, ambient occlusion, ray tracing, grass, realistic terrain, colors, new ui, new mini map and some other things that The Culling demo from Blizzcon2018 already had and now they dont are there more… This things need back! So, i want to say about the models, they look good! But the graphics not :frowning:

11

My boy my boy my boy, people won´t understand your point of view. Alot of them are blizzard fanbois and they will eat just anything thats given to them. The justify it sometimes by saying that “be happy they kept all 16 years servers online”, or be happy at least something is happening to the game. Well probably all these guys are people who never played any other paid modern game and stick only to games like CSGO,WC3 etc, these OG games. So it doesnt matter if you suggest this, they dont know exactly what they want- they want the game to be alive again but on the other hand to change nothing, only to have league system (some of them) which cant be done without many players. The game for competitive will be the same as it used to with main source of tournaments in china and maybe the custom game scene will grow a little. But thats it. I agree with all you said, i wouldnt be angry if they would add so much more into the pvp. Imagine just adding New mode lets say we play alot on stream Random Race Random Heroes - add this as ladder mode and you already have something unique,new and people will love it and its gonna keep the game fresh. Whatever. Im glad there are people that think in a same way as i do. At this point IF this is the final thing (people will call me out taht this is only “beta” - which is totaly only like alpha ) its not worth more than 15 euro. And speaking of beta excuse - WHY in the whole universe would you put UPDATES to beta :smiley: if that wouldnt be a final product, again people dont understand that beta is beta and its never touched. So why the hell the updates and community responses to it? People can be so blind. Its so easy to realize that this is a version thats getting updates and will be given to us in a month . (i hope im wrong but facts says all for itself). Cheers

12

yeah it s too much for 80-120 €

13

They would never cancel it, they spend 2 years making reforged and they will release it, even if it flops.

14

You do realize the Dollar is weaker than the Euro, do you not?

If you pay $40 for something, it will cost €35 for europeans.

15

The game cost in europe 40euro for the spoils of war and 30 the basic.

16

Mine was just plain sarcrasm cause from a 30$/30€ price tag people started claiming 40/70 for no reason… no one is forcing to buy the 40$/€ spoils of war (and still wanna know where the 70 bucks price comes from). The game doesn’t look great but starting to lie about the price to prove somekind of point makes you just look like a little whiny kid.

17

How can anyone agree with OP at anything is beyond me, you guys are the biggest trolls out there and should be banned from forums tbh