+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2 Likes
Didnāt your mom teach you not to lie boy?
If you want to make a claim at least have evidence to back it up
Low skill terrans kids these days just lack manners
4 Likes
On a previous post the vegetable said that he (the vegetable) has a Degree inā¦Mathematics.
1 Like
Where is the lie? Prove that it is a lie! Are you lying?
Terran unit is nowhere close to protoss. Even void ray mlre efficienct than marines.
Thatās why protoss as soon as they see Marines ā¦they rush ā¦Voids.
Somebody put this guy out of his misery.
This is a GM Player (with a Diploma in Mathematics)ā¦
2 Likes
āUnless protoss unit is efficient against their counters, they arenāt efficient.ā
āUnless marauders beat carriers, they arenāt efficient.ā
Bulbous words that speak nonsense and hate of terransā¦ while whining that void rays should beat marines or they are not efficientā¦ the PPP do not love factsā¦ only love protossā¦
Only in Starcraft somone will say that 3 is the same as 4 because of X. Tallk about people needing to go back to 1st grade and learn you to count.
X is normalized in sampleā¦
I wouldnt want to. I would like to keep this as simple as possible so every one can understand.
With that being said. If you mine out 4 bases you clearly mined more minerals than someone that mined out 3 bases.
Yet people that play protoss is trying to say that because of mules that terran has more minerals. they are not factoring in that they have chorono. Yes there are a lot of differrent variables to consider however.
You can never have more minerals mining out 3 bases than somone that mined out 4 bases. I do not understand the logic of SC players.
It is mining rate vs total resource mined. Protoss has higher mining rate than terran. Even with mules. On top of that they have more efficient units.
Nobody cares about opinions. The data shows Terran is more cost effective.
1 Like
h ttps://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QbhJGjhWFfY/XmD1vVqfkQI/AAAAAAAAI4Y/TYUzuCHrP48du3F5dyfI0aI8vmDdlwblgCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/mu_ce_races_2_0_17467605.png
The link you posted in the OP shows Terran doing significantly better in match up specific cost efficiency.
Just because a few units, like Immortals, have really high average cost efficiency in practice (because theyāre microed like crazy to keep them alive, especially in PvZ), does not mean that Protoss is trading efficiently.
Also from the link you posted: Zealots are at 0.62 - Marines are at 1.56, stalkers are at 1.55, Marauders are at 1.75.
The Terran units that are made the most have better efficiency.
4 Likes
Misunderstanding unit counters is a big nonsense from you. A unit can be efficient without being spammed against units that counter it. If a unit is only efficient if it beat the counters, no unit is efficient. By your ālogicā no unit is efficientā¦ too many bulbous words and not enough logic.
1 Like
Can you speak my language well? Noā¦ so does that mean I win the argument? My second language better than yoursā¦ more nonsense from forum trollsā¦
Sit down boy
You just got body bagged, take your L and fight another day kiddo
Stay in school and finish your education cause you need it. Remember not to lie, it will make your mom very sad to know she raised a liar
3 Likes
This is a nonsense. Maguro show protoss units more efficient. All the protoss unit are at top of the list! Marines donāt come close to immortalsā¦
Jada jadaā¦
Are YOU Maguro?
Itās not a shameful thing to be Maguro, confess.
You do ad hominem because you lose debate. Bulbous words are weak strategy!