Harstem clumped a bunch of probes … Mines is OP because it hit right when he clumped them. Harstem playing like a beast while Innovation just won while playing like a noob
Allows drops in his base… yes Harstem sucha beast in fact hes favored vs multiple time including winning vs Serral this year Innovation WHAT AN UPSET.
It is 5 AM in Korea… and Inno still won gtfo with these moronic lies
I respect harstem as a player, He shows allot of ways to deal with problems in the current meta game, and he also discusses things with the community.
But lets face it, when is the last time harstem went for a full macro mode strategy. Where both players max out and take half of the map.
I can guarantee you. He wont go there. He gets 5 base max. The problems in PvT are lategame. When harstem ussually wins in the mid-late game.
harstem says Protoss versus terran is fine. But then again he is also one of the guys who believes in the power of the chargelot.
Neglecting all other strategies and tactics that want to result into a macro game.
Every other pro gamer I’ve ever heard talk about disruptors shares my thoughts about it. You’d have to be a moron to think THAT is the pinnacle of skill in P vs P. It’s absolutely outrageous.
I thought Protoss players were too busy cheesing themselves to death in PvP.
So, long story short, “he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, the worthless posters on these General Discussion forums do…” Okay, great. Thanks for the nuanced opinion.
No, You disagree with him because he’s telling you Terran is having a hard time. You have a bone to pick with Terran (Show us on the doll, where the Terran touched…)
No one is surprised for an instant that you had this opinion. People like you are so boring.
I did and I still think the same thing. Innovation is a good player. It’s silly to think otherwise, similar to how it’s silly to say that classic beating (anyone) doesn’t make protoss OP.
Baneling does not hit air and dies on contact genius. Basically Baneling is an overpriced Scarab (BW) where the Zerg player instead of the Raver-AI manages manually, genius.
LOL, compares WM with Baneling!
different races are different you know,when you get the race that can afford to throw away units(zerg) banelings are more effective than wms
also imagine terran with banelings,oh the cry
I doubt it seriously! Terrans are accustomed to relay on 70% AI-automated fighting, hence the meme: Ghost/Ravens are so hard to use".
If terrans were to lose WM and gain Bane their play would plummet at 35% winrate vs. P/Z.
ohh,so a move and forget about it unit is hard to use,but a burrow one to fire is easier? oh nice
not like u are supposed to target fire wms because they do nothing without that vs competent zergs
in the mean time (in lategame!!!) zergs just move 30 banes and forget about them,because whatever they get is al right because of how the game works
(in an “even” game zerg gets to mine more,therefore can afford to throw away units for example into a planetary,even if there is an oc next to it)