No no, don’t get me wrong. It’s not a hivemind, it’s people taking low hanging fruit. They’ll just like and agree with any baseless argument that confirms what they suspect. They literally have nothing but some scarce videos. Videogames are played, not watched.
Case in point, people agreeing and liking their make-believes about how the netcode works. They have no idea of networking whatsoever and they think there’s a nefarious dark hand that takes your projectiles. That’s usually the popular, dead wrong opinion.
So if they get something that is factually false wrong, how can they be nuanced on other more subjective fields?
PS: example. Thread says: orisa is dead
What is the foundation for thinking it’s worse than current game. Please elaborate. Until people get their hands on the game and feel it for some hours it’s what one would call biased take. I always said I’m carefully optimistic for 5v5 because anything could go wrong… but I for one like the idea of tank synergy gone to give more overall freedom.
People have already made threads like this:
Look at all thoise likes. But when you see gameplay Orisa absolutely thrives on OW2 while on OW1 she was relegated to mostly dumpster fire unless you’re in GM. Orisa has been dead for quite some time for most of the situations.
They wanted this kit to go to a new hero when OW2 rework is giving her the strengths over the weaknesses she had on OW1 which made her very stationary.
But there’s ALWAYS something to complain about here.