Perhaps the change you proposed wasn’t a Megadodo original thought, but you made an entire thread surroundingthe idea, which is a proposal.
You proposing it and it not being an original thought aside, your wording seems to be very for the change (though, I understand you’d be just as okay if this particular change never saw the light of day).
So, let’s clarify your definitions even more. “Pro-Mercy” is someone that doesn’t want a change, but would be open to a change of some kind as long as the current play style remains untouched. “Anti-Mercy” is someone that wants a change to Mercy in some form. The key word in these definitions being want. To be redundant: You don’t want a change, but you’d be open to one if Mercy’s current playstyle goes unchanged. Am I understanding this correctly?
Maybe it’s clearly explained to you, but the way you choose to word things leaves a lot of space for misunderstandings and misinterpretation.