What if it was possible to play at that level on an entry-level to mid-range system?
What if we only had to pay a monthly fee, something like $20 to access a system that could do that provided we had good internet?
I think it would be amazing if Overwatch was on a service like that.
What do you guys think?!
Didnt Nvidia just cancel their remote gaming service? Also, until they figure out latency issues wont happen.
What if I told you that sub 40ms click to pixel latency was possible?
Maybe in about 10 years.
it still wont make you an e-athlete
What if I told you that in two months NVIDIA was coming out with a service that could do that for $20 per month… Would you sign up if it had Overwatch?
Totally hypothetical…
Why would they cancel the previous service? Also, the user has to have the hardware capable to do it. Meaning their display must be capable upscaling is not an option.
If you put the work in and train hard then why not?
then train on a 60hz crt like the csgo pros
once you master it it will make goku taking his weight clothes off look like a kids game
Well they could do something like have multiple services, I guess?
But yeah you would need a 4K capable screen.
Or a 120 Hz capable screen.
I have talked about this quiet frequently in the A/V world, most users could not tell the difference between 60 to 240 hz. They can notice color, detail, and resolutions but not FPS.
Ok but Vegeta trains way harder than Goku. Didn’t Vegeta do something like 500 times gravity? He’s the real champion of the show.
To be honest this is true.
Most people probably can’t notice a difference above 90 Hz. I know I can’t.
But everyone can notice the lower latency, until you get to the point of diminishing returns.
I think 40 Ms is a good target.
IT is more than that, I really should look up the name of the Nvidia service but to lazy atm. If you work remotely into machines, servers, content, etc. You can tell by the quality, latency, etc. I say give it about 10 years and they will begin to experiment again.
So I guess sort of what you’re saying is that we should leave that sort of thing to the enthusiast realm?
But I mean would you be willing to try such a service if it was completely free?
I mean it wouldn’t give you the 4K and the 120 FPS but it could give you something like up to 1080p, would you try it out then?
You have to because people are not to keen in constantly updating displays. I mean look how long 1080p has stuck around. If you work in commerical AV you get to see some amazing displays but are the cost worth it? Nope, especially for the masses. There really is no need for 8k, I would prefer a faster refresh rate and hz. IMAX records in 16k but you also have to remember you can daisychain displays for resolutions. I think we will see 4k 240 hz displays this year or maybe next year.
Than you have competitive gamers which make me laugh. You opt to play a game in 1080p at 500+ FPS because you believe it gives an advantage. By believing this nonsense you are preventing innovation by the companies who want your money. Look at Asus announcing a 1080p 500 hz display this CES. That is nothing special.
I agree… But if it was free would you at least try it out?
I have the setup that can do it without the need of share computing.
I understand that but I’m just saying for the purposes of demonstration and seeing how it all works would you be curious to give it a try?
I am not into shared computing at all, I would have to read the EULA.