The Matchmaker - Microtransaction based Patterns

Is the Overwatch matchmaker designed to sell skins?

I’m not here to tell you, or convince you that it factually is. I don’t know, I nor anyone else has any proof that would hold up in a court of law. I am here to say that I believe there is, and list my reasons why I think that is.

I’ve made many comments about this. I’ve intentionally left out my personal experiences in the OP (for which there are many).

Here are some things that when looked at individually might look unrelated. But when compiled and looked at together, may seem a little sus.

To attempt to make this entertaining if not just goofy. I’m going to pretend I am Blizzard in some parts of this post. I’m having a bit of fun with this so it does get a bit outrageous. :upside_down_face:


First and foremost the actual factual patent.


patents(dot)google(dot)com/patent/US20160001181A1/en

  • [0036]

The microtransaction engine may analyze various items used by marquee players and, if the items are being promoted for sale, match the marquee player with another player (e.g., a junior player) that does not use or own the items. Similarly, the microtransaction engine may identify items to be promoted, identify marquee players that use those items, and match the marquee players with other players who do not use those items. In this manner, the microtransaction engine may leverage the matchmaking abilities described herein to influence purchase decisions for game-related purchases.

  • [0037]

In one implementation, the microtransaction engine may target particular players to make game-related purchases based on their interests. For example, the microtransaction engine may identify a junior player to match with a marquee player based on a player profile of the junior player. In a particular example, the junior player may wish to become an expert sniper in a game (e.g., as determined from the player profile). The microtransaction engine may match the junior player with a player that is a highly skilled sniper in the game. In this manner, the junior player may be encouraged to make game-related purchases such as a rifle or other item used by the marquee player.

  • [0038]

In one implementation, when a player makes a game-related purchase, the microtransaction engine may encourage future purchases by matching the player (e.g., using matchmaking described herein) in a gameplay session that will utilize the game-related purchase. Doing so may enhance a level of enjoyment by the player for the game-related purchase, which may encourage future purchases. For example, if the player purchased a particular weapon, the microtransaction engine may match the player in a gameplay session in which the particular weapon is highly effective, giving the player an impression that the particular weapon was a good purchase. This may encourage the player to make future purchases to achieve similar gameplay results.


Okay. There’s the patent. It looks fishy. The argument I’ve seen against this patent is that just because it is patented doesn’t mean it is being used.

Technically true… How often does a company go through the effort to make a patent and not use it? Do you know the exact stats? If you believe most corporations do this without the intent to use the patent, can you source any information? Did you hear a smart looking corporate person say this? Did you learn this in college?

I’m genuinely curious. Is this thought process factually true or is it propaganda to get the population to doubt investigations into it? I’m ignorant of this, and inclined to assume it’s propaganda. Why make the patent if not to use it?


I am Blizzard. I want to put this system in place, but I cannot let the public know. How do I achieve this?

Lack of Transparency:
I must remove as much transparency as possible. In Overwatch 1, I showed everyone’s rank in the form of Skill Rating points. At the start of every ranked match I displayed everyone’s rank and both teams average SR. Profiles were public and could be checked by all players in a game.

I must remove this, I cannot allow players ranks to easily be checked.

I will change the ranked system. Remove SR points and hide it completely with the already hidden MMR. I cannot have the players to know where they are in their rank for as long as possible. Only after 5 wins or 20 games will they learn their own rank, let alone the other players they are matched with.

I don’t want people to see in each game, that they may have a relatively fresh gold player with no skins purchased, being placed against a diamond player veteran who has many skins that we are selling in the shop. I will however, make sure there is a great chance that Diamond player will have play of the game while they wear their fancy new skin!


Promote Solo Queue:

So with my system in place, it would make sense for me to promote solo queue. It is much more difficult to promote skin sales if all of these players are in a group. But how do I promote solo queue?

Ah of course, I must remove promotions for grouping up.

I have to remove LFG. This system is a great utility for the players, even though it is not used by all. It is still a nice utility for the players to have access to. Much like the workshop. I have no reason to remove it other than it hinders my ability to sell skins. I can’t have these players looking for groups. I need to match the players as best as I can to sell my skins! LFG is going to hinder my matchmaker.

Removal of visible groups:

Now I have removed LFG, I have to further remove any promotions of grouping up. If players see that there are others on their team in a group, they may be inclined to want to group up themselves! I can’t have this. I don’t want players wanting to group up.

So I will remove the visual effect that shows when players are in a group.


Control my narrative:
I cannot have people discussing my matchmaker system with no pushback. I must order some moderators on the forums to push back against any claims of such absurdity. To slander anyone and everyone as conspiracy theorists. I only need 2 or 3 individuals to sew doubt in the minds any that speak about it in the forums. That is enough to convert many into conspiracy theorist deniers. And the posts and threads that dare seek to push the boundaries too far, will simply be removed. Those that made the posts will then be monitored closer forever more.

But how do I control the public opinion outside of the forum? Ah yes.

I will have some well known and beloved streamers flown to our headquarters. I will give them many perks, and fly them to Blizzcon too. I will make them feel incredibly special, and included into the inner workings of the company. They will know that they specifically were hand picked for their talents. Of course I will only show them the surface. I will dangle carrots on a stick, and require them to sign my NDA each and every time. I will have my staff butter them up, and gain their trust and affection.

And then by the power of my NDA, I will ensure that the official stream team cannot speak against my narrative. Any mention of McCree from their teammates must be rebuked. Who’s McCree? Oh you mean CASSIDY!

I will ensure they all must deny that 6 v 6 should return. They must either be in favor of 5 v 5, or if they must sit on a fence, then they will spread the propaganda that 6 v 6 will never return. It is impossible to return. Any talk of LFG, or of guilds must cease. And yes, there once was a time where people spoke of wanting a guild system. I will not allow it ever again. I will have my trusting and friendly staff ensure the streamers respect these demands. As they are bound by NDA.

I know this will work, because my friends at Gearbox have done the same thing. And it was very successful.


  • I am BK and I serve my shareholders, I care not for the players of this game. These systems will be put in place and my shareholders will realize how powerful this will be. So much so, that even when I am long gone they will make it impossible for the new leader to remove this system.



Okay I’m Slid again. The fever dream is over.

Just some closing thoughts.

Is it weird that it wasn’t until after Bobby left, it was changed so GM’s were allowed to group up fully and look like they’re having fun? Not just a duo but a full group. I.e. Promotion of grouping up to the average player.


If you think ‘I don’t believe there is a system in place, this patent and these changes are not enough proof’. That is fine. Sure skepticism can be warranted. Innocent until proven guilty.

But to say ‘There is without a doubt absolutely and factually no system in use’… Is wrong. There is a possibility, a strong one, that a system like this is in use.

I honestly believe Acti-Blizz has done so much damage to their games under Bobby’s rule, with such little care to their players, that skepticism for their defense should be minimal.


If you are a Blizzard employee in the know and reading this. Maybe you can convince the uppers to be completely transparent about this. Have Aaron bring up the patent, explain it’s not in use. Maybe it was in use under Kotick, maybe it wasn’t. Transparency is key to public trust. Appreciate you.

/essay


Have any experiences at all with ‘rigged’ matchmaking? Put em below!

12 Likes

I, personally, do not particularly care anymore. My opinion is that the human brain is adept at discerning patterns and most of these “conspiracies” are merely common sense. It is relatively obvious how the game went from regularly stable matches with real human beings back when less people understood a more complicated game to this absolute mess.

That being said, no offense intended to anyone here, I am just over it. I have someone highly intelligent to discuss this with in person and do not need the usual suspects screeching about my experiences that I have thoroughly tested. It just doesn’t matter… Because this a party game.

As for your question about patents, some companies do indeed sit on them exclusively so that other companies cannot patent the idea. There are two reasons for the behavior. First of all, there is nothing compelling them to actively use their patent. They do not have to. It’s strange, but yeah… That leads to the logical consequence which are referred to as patent trolls (not even joking). Companies that race to patent an idea and threaten legal action for violating their patents. Naturally, as implied earlier, they do not even need to have the means to execute on their idea to begin with. It’s just future proofing, I suppose?

In the case of Activision, I would assume the ideas are already implemented as they are clearly not targeting any other developers with malicious matchmaking. Albeit, they might just be saving it for a rainy day. A new IP? Perhaps the technology is not there yet? I do not know. There are just way too many inconsistencies for me to write it off. There is no reason for them to patent troll and as far as I am aware, they do not have a history of it.

7 Likes

I’m with you there with the not caring. Well, about 90% of the time that is.

Then when I’m bored with nothing to do, suddenly I care a lot. Some sort of Karen energy is summoned from the cosmos. This post was to provoke some thought, to humour, and pass my own time really.

I do find other people’s experiences with the weirdness interesting though.

I would be lying if I said I don’t want some proof to come to light just so I could say I told you so. Or on the flipside, some proof to come to light to put my suspicions to bed.

Trueee. That reminds of Bethesda suing I believe was Notch the founder of Mojang for trying to name one of his games Scrolls. The word Scrolls in the title of his game, how preposterous!

Thanks for your input TB I appreciate you :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

That’s shifting butden of proof. A logical fallacy.

To sell it.

Did you already forgot? It was used obly by e-girls to adverise and find simps… It was used by next to no one in the eay you eant to spin it was used.

That is the reason it wasn’t ported to OW2.

It was to reduce toxicity around groups… people had tendency to give up if they saw two 3-stacks vs 6 individuals…

It’s not this isn’t “not rnough proof”… it’s that it isn’t proof at all. Using a logical fallacy isn’t proof. Collection if anecdotes isn’t data. And, finally, assertions aren’t evidence.

I am not saying that you are wrong, and blizzard don’t use that patent, that alse requires evidence. I am saying you are not rational here, because you are not using reason.

And yeah, you have a right to believe that it is the case, but others have right to know that what you are engaging here is fallacious reasoning.

1 Like

Thank you for this post and the information on the patents, especially. I doubt this thread will last, but know you did a good job. This company is a disaster and it needs to be exposed.

Btw, :point_up:t3: might be one of those people you mentioned, given his post history, lol. I mean, just look at how fast he went to attempt to discredit everything you wrote. Yikes.

He even did it in a way to not directly state that you were wrong, just that your reasoning was flawed and people shouldn’t believe you because of why you think a certain way. That’s some legal wording at play. Discrediting the individual, without directly denying the allegations.

6 Likes

Hehe i knew you’d be one of the first to comment Trickster, calling me out on my illogical fallacies. Appreciate you.

In my opinion, if one see’s weirdness again and again and again, its illogical not to think something is up. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice…

One such example.
When the Moira Lillith skin released, that super expensive $70 one. I saw it in many games. I was flabbergasted this many players were spending that much on it.

I also saw a few different clips on Noobhunter. Moiras were stealing the potg from their teammates who were getting 4ks. Like a zarya grav, zarya damaging, zarya killing 4. Potg from the pov of Moira watching it and throwing damage orb into the grav. Another one was a reaper potg stolen from just healing a bit and damaging a bit. Then I realized, hey that happened to me too. A moira wearing the lillith skin stole a potg from my teammate. All in the same week the skin released.

That certainly looks like the matchmaker putting me and others in games with Moira, ensuring she gets potg privilege so people can be in awe of the skin and make more sales.

PS: I hope you dont flag this one down. I think it is important for both sides to discuss their points and opinions.

4 Likes

So lets start off with the obvious: there idea of the matchmaker “rigging” individual matches is conspiratorial nonsense right up there with people who think the moon landing was faked or that a group of reptiles secretly rule the world.

Moving past that it is probably true that when possible the matchmaker puts you on the same team as people who have skins. It is not really that difficult of a task to do after all considering how the matchmaker works. For example you could, in theory, flip each team’s tank and it should not affect the win % of a match. Therefore adjusting the teams so that each team has someone with skins on it is a trivial matter that can be done often without any impact on the result.

It’s called logical fallacy, not illogical fallacy.

And yeah, i tend to be one of the firsts this time of day, because i have a lot of free time at work… Jealous! (That’s a joke)

No… it’s illogical to think something is up without good evidence.

It it is natural to jump to the conclusions like you do, since that’s how we evolved to think. Pascal’s wager actually do work when you are out in the savanna trying to avoid tigers. But it has nothing to do with logic.

Why would I flag it? There is nothing against ToS as far as I can tell.

Never bought anything, matchmaker doing fine. Argument debunked.

1 Like

This is a fantastic post thanks for writing this!

:+1:

1 Like

So I have never bought skins or anything. I have literally given blizzard 0 dollars except when I purchased OW1 with a very nice deal.

Is this the reason why I always get the Sombra in the enemy team while playing Ball?
Blizzard just want me to leave and let skins buyers win? :joy:

Yea OW does try to get me to buy rifles, I’ve noticed that

Two accounts in two different ranks so yes!

1 Like

Do I think all the OP’s points about lfg and grouping point to the patents being used? No. While interesting thoughts, I don’t see a connection there.

Would I be surprised if the patented systems were actually being used in game currently? No. The people in charge are so desperate for short term profits, I suspect they’d use every tactic at there disposal to get people to spend money.

1 Like

Big if true, and would not surprise me in the least. It makes sense from a business perspective, but is absolutely idiotic on a player-retention perspective (which long-term makes no sense for the business lmao). Fortnite does this with their bots (obviously OW can’t do this): You load into a lobby, see a bunch of ‘people’ with skins from the battlepass, or recent store additions, performing entertaining emotes. It’s hard to tell they’re bots in the lobby too. The matchmaker is already terrible, so blizzard using it to advertise cosmetics doesn’t change much in their eyes.

1 Like

Seems about right-- Mercy

dumb thread i hope it ends here.

They put the big skin players vs the no skin f2p. It’s a common tactic to match people in games against enemies that have a store item in almost every microtransaction game. Gachas with chat even announce when someone pulls a super rare character. I just think i notice the enemy skins more since i play support i want those skins but i a f2p. I saw bee mercy today ugh I want it but im not funding this damn game anymore.

1 Like

No.

Not sure who to make this longer, but no again.

But how do you know?