So why is Jake allowed to be a face for pro OW play?

20 Likes

because there’ll come a time where people need to stop bringing in baggage from over a year ago and realize that one moment of frustration isn’t indicative of a player’s overall personality

68 Likes

Because he’s young and attractive.

Literally all there is to it. That’s how all poster boys are made. He’s really nothing special outside of that.

11 Likes

Because something that happened a year ago doesn’t shape an entire person.

Look at Jeff Kaplan’s history on Everquest. At face value you wouldn’t want a player like that representing your game, let alone being the face of the game’s development and lead design. Yet now, people couldn’t even imagine him saying the things he did back in the day.

29 Likes

Ok but literally telling someone to kill themself is probably in the range of “entirely unacceptable.” It’s kind of the most horrid thing you can do online.

I’m not talking about vanilla rage, someone yelling “YOU SUCK UNINSTALL” or anything like that. This is next level.

17 Likes

You can leave out the second part.

6 Likes

And unlike half the OWL Roster, he doesn’t talk like he has a mental disability.

Jake is the face of OWL because he’s one of the few players who can actually pass for a normal human being.

5 Likes

We get it. You like XQC.

There’s still a difference between time of saying the things they said, the frequency of misbehaving and a difference in the targets they choose.

Background-checks and importance of personality have only become relevant since XQC and other mistakes.

It was a different time when Jake first entered OWL.

2 Likes

Can’t tell if this is against the forums’ ToS…
Assuming it is, considering it’s calling out a specific player…

Soooo…flag?

Also: Video be old bro. Need to come up with more recent data to appease the ‘it’s old and dated’ crowd.

3 Likes

what now?

Does having an accent equate to ‘talking like he/she has a mental disability’ now or something? lol

2 Likes

Lol you couldn’t be further from the truth. I don’t like him at all.

I wouldn’t want either of them representing the game.

3 Likes

People also don’t necessarily change that much.

He’s still running under part of the same screen name he used back then.

He felt that someone getting reported several thousand times and only getting a week ban was a time for a roast rather than indicative of a major issue.

Jake? more like Yeahke

The problem being that you can dig up dirt all you want for every potential “face of OWL.”

Jake has been acting nothing but professional with just the right amount of rivalry around the Houston Outlaws.

Maybe it’s about making a statement of showing players how they can “strive to cleanse themselves from such things?”
Because that’s really what he is - a classic player, one of “us”, assuming the responsible role-model or face of OWL.

If you reprimand it now after all this time, you’d turn him into another anti-hero for the toxic crowd who now would feel their toxic ways to be “rebellious” yet again.

I get your sentiment but I disagree. Why are “redemption” cases held in higher esteem than people who were always good?

It would show a lack of tolerance for unacceptable behaviour. “you tell someone to kill themselves, maybe you redeem yourself but not here. It’s too late for you.”

2 Likes

Maybe you shouldn’t throw too many stones at days long past.

Hit us up again, if you find something that isn’t as dated.

What’s the expiry date on being reprimanded for bad behaviour?

1 Like

Redemption is a thing. Telling someone to take their own life is utterly heinous, and I probably wouldn’t have given Jake a second chance. However, his behavior over the past year has proven to be perfectly acceptable.

1 Like

Who?

… is he though?? :thinking: