I cant play because waiting time.
I dont understand why OW still dont remove role queue.
Role queue is failed systems.
OW should make 111 & 3 Flex a new rank game.
Of course I know. I’ve written here, but it’s a meaningless act, like speaking in the air.
sigh.
13 Likes
it has never made sense for me for it to exist in competitive
but for what ever reason people are convinced that they need 2 of each class on their team
7 Likes
They have Quickplay Clownery in arcade already. Open Queue for competitive.
24 Likes
Open que technically is an option.
If you’re having high wait times, try flexing for priority passes?
7 Likes
Nah.
11 Likes
The game has been balanced around a forced 2-2-2 setting for over a year now, there’s no going back.
That said, Quick Play Classic and Open Queue Competitive exist.
11 Likes
they did it cause most never pick supports or tanks, cause they want to 1 trick, and 2-2-2 made ironically more sense. I hate role queue and never play it.
1 Like
If you don’t know there’s thing called Competitive Open Queue and Quick Play Classic. Have fun there and stop complaining.
16 Likes
Having role que was the best thing they’ve added to the game. No more tanks/supports rage quitting back to dps role after one wipe.
5 Likes
Remove roll queue and remove a lot of players as well. It’s the only thing that barely makes the game playable. If roll queue were removed I’d be uninstalling for good because that pile of bull dropping we had before didn’t work at all.
Now if they could just get their head around making a working MM system then we’d actually be talking about a decent game.
2 Likes
99% of the community disagrees with you
sure, because 99% of the community plays Open Queue and QP classic
/s
11 Likes
yup 
although I see nothing whatsoever that can reasonably be described as “clownery” in qp classic, this very statement is a tacit admission of the differences between the 222 modes and their allegedly equal role-less queue counterparts
if role-less queue modes were more equal to the 222 modes, I believe there’d be far less to complain about
For now, given the many differences between the two, and also given the many problems that 222 has inflicted upon the game, there is a LOT to complain about
see above
If Blizzard were to decide to return to role-less queue mode, they would absolutely “go back”
and they’ve already demonstrated multiple times that there is plenty of reason to consider a “go back”
actually, it was because of OWL.
ticket-buying customers were tiring of the same team compositions on both sides over and over and over, and ergo ticket revenue was in danger
For me personally, the addition of 222 and the many severe problems it added to this game was THE very worst change this game has ever seen
1 Like
I started playing since launch i am a tank/support main before role que if it was me(tank) and 5 dps, or me(support) 5 dps i would switch to a DPS i am not playing tank without a healer or a support without a tank, and if they remove role que i will go back to the same practice
people didnt like role queue so they added open, people didnt like open so they added role what dont you see about this
Please post your data where you got this number from.
2 Likes
Play open queue, very fast queue times and people generally play good comps and flex a lot. Best thing is that, where fastest queue in roleq is about 2-3 mins (tank) and longest is like 9-12 min dps, Open queue is always less than a minute.
At least under a minute queues is true on my rank (plat-diamond). People generally play better too, than in role queue (Because there never was a mmr reset before 2-2-2 launched lol)
Blizzard didn’t know how to fix Goats, so they garbaged the whole game to make Goats impossible.
1 Like
not at all
this was to resolve a problem affecting ticket sales in OWL
those of us who prefer role-less queue do play roleless queue, but unfortunately, there are a number of differences between role-less queue and 222 aside from queuing, and this makes role-less queue not equal/equivalent to their 222 counterparts
If the two were more equal, there’s be less to complain about