What I’m arguing is that It cannot tell complex things like value for example of a symmetra teleporter the statistics would show that you would only go through the teleporter but we’re not sure whether it was a was placing the good position or not or with the value of placing it in that certain position would be. Things that do not deliver stats to the AI but are known by abstract. Just like a brig boop. What would be registered is that I have booped the player for 70 damage and whether I killed him or not or booped them off the ledge but it would be difficult for the system to know if I booped him in order to save another player or any case in which I’m manipulating a situation and not performing something purely because of damage. It does not know strategy.
It does not matter if it’s a tournament or not it’s a competition. A tournament works in the same way actually. The very reason they don’t calculate these players MMR range and only award their wins with PBSR weighed against them is because if they did that in an actual competition it would be met with massive disapproval for many reasons. Predefined teams what’s the difference the point is it’s a team playing against a team that’s how every match works. The only difference is that solo queuing is predefined in the short term by random, but you are playing with a team defined by the Matchmaker regardless. If anything OWL potentially would have more of a MMR difference if calculated and potentially more unfair than the the games matchmaker and still pbsr is not weighed against them Regulations probably more or less the same as this game has rules.
Every difference about it is trivial the important part of it is the same and you should know that.
Are they really? No, do you know what particular style the average player plays? Because that style will be the average stats reflected up there weighed against me. Now can you guarantee that I play exactly like the average brig player plays? No. Being weighed by the the stats of the way an average fish swims does not account for what particular fish you are. So if the average stats were used against every fish it would the best interest of all fishes.
It is like the standard of normal that we have with people. The average person is normal sure but that’s not guarantee that some are not weirder than others and neither does being normal or weird guarantee their success in life. So long as they can make the most out of who they are they succeed.
Sure everyone gets the same opportunity, but only for what can be measured in stats. Does the system know if you’re a betters strategist? No. Does the system know that if you use your strategy to set up a situation that allowed your teammate to get a kill or perhaps save their life? No. Those are the variables that won’t be on the test and those are the variables that count for the game. And being better at strategy can make up for the fact that you do not get good stats but if the test does not test for strategy then you will always be subpar, because strategy is the only thing that’s being measured and your advantage means nothing while the advantage of others who rely on stats still counts.