Not, you list the differences but you didn’t list why they’re adequate or why they would make a difference.
This is an assumption you cannot know that. Mine is a assumption as well but you chose to argue about this because you couldn’t explain the discrepancy between win ratio and pbsr. If you’d like we would both retract our assumptions and you find another way to argue why the win ratio shows I’m a good player and the pbsr shows I’m a bad player.
Yes but if I don’t win against better players but I still maintain a higher win ratio then that means that I should have stagnated at least not gone down 300 Sr since the time I’ve initially started. Your argument against losing primarily against bad player cannot be argued as it is an assumption as all your arguments are based off assumptions. since we are dealing with averages unless you want to argue that the Matchmaker has consistently put me up against more worse players than it has good players because that is the only way I could get enough bad players to consistently rank down while winning more games. However if you argue for this point that would mean that it’s the matchmaker’s fault and I’m pretty sure you don’t want to blame the Matchmaker.
The difference between my argument and yours is the mind has statistical precedence, the wind ratio and pbsr are not supposed to deviate in the long run that doesn’t say anything per se but it says more than an assumption ever will.
You’re right my math was wrong for some dumb reason I divided the losses by the wins.
I’m complaining because as you seen on my stats before it doesn’t matter that only 1 season of ended with I ended with higher wind ratios and sometimes climbing because eventually pbsr will always put me back down to where I was. I started off as gold because of placements in seasons later after playing about 300 games I got back to gold and still maintained a positive win ratio season by season yet I was back to 1700 regardless it doesn’t matter if I climb now pbsr.
But here’s a more official source …
A link to this post was given by a green text form user so I’m guessing at one point this guy was a mod. As you can see even they acknowledge the same thing that I am saying. And they acknowledge that both sides of the arguments existed one that wanted the acceleration and one that didn’t want stat farming. Ultimately it wasn’t because the possibility of stat farming doesn’t exist, abd there was in fact more people who did not want it.
which is why they removed it on diamonds however they kept it on bronze through platinum simply because this accelerates the progress of certain players (smurfs & the precious new smurf revenue that they chose not to fix and compromise competitive integrity for). There was a proposition to eventually cut it off after sufficient amounts of games were played in competitive but as you can see after 884 I have given you my stats and that it obviously does not cut off. However if you notice nowhere in the post does it say that the problem was ever solved, but it does acknowledge the problem exists and that’s why they took it off of diamond and above, and why it doesn’t exist on every rank to this day.
Try giving GM players, diamond players,
and master players PBSR and see how they will react. If it were indeed so accurate they should have no problem with it, but they do, because they know the flaws inherent within it.