Practice range bots

It’s been ~5 seasons, when will the practice range bots be 250 HP instead of 200? Get a grip on consistency god damn.

10 Likes

They were my solace when they had hanzo one shot removed , let them stay that way they are good bots.

4 Likes

It is great practice for the return of 6v6… Am I right, or am I right? Surely 6v6 will reverse the curse of season 9…

:muscle::weary:

2 Likes

It has potential to make the game better.

Atleast it’s the most recognisable solution so far.

But nothing will be easy with this game, unless they put in a ton of effort and balance for it a few times to make it work then see how it goes.

Tank numbers is too much of a problem yesterday I got matched against a 4 stack three times in a row and they don’t play tank,

How come their q is same as solo me.

Cause the game puts any tank they get and two matches were decided by tank diff.

1 Like

Tanks have oq health pools. They don’t really care about consistency evidently

I also don’t get their aim practice area in practice range. The bots there have EVEN LESS health and have 0 representation of how someone would move in game, including their “player strafe” mode.

Why don’t they, like every normal game does, make it emulate random heroes and make them have normal health? Custom games do it properly. This aim practice arena is literally useless

1 Like

doesn’t matter since practice range is the only safe space that isn’t rigged. the only place players can laser with their character’s FULL damage output, to preserve the illusion that if you can aim, you’ll be able to laser in actual matches. however, outside of practice range, the fraud begins.

KRAANDOP LOSES entire current match. Unless devs reverse rig it, live, to counteract prediction.

Keep Shirley out of this!

1 Like

Yeah I don’t know how the top players are beginning to struggle to win. I’ve seen awkward, flats, kraan, bogur and many others go on losing streaks and even derank to masters before, doesn’t seem right.

The rank you see in competitive is meaningless anyway, last season I asked people and everyone had a different range, different type (wide vs narrow)

It makes even less sense when previous top 500 players for example that currently have metal rank get matched up against players who never reached top 500. Make it match up similar players: example both peaked top 500 and are currently in diamond, etc

yep, if ML7 isn’t popping we know the source code is infested with multi-layered rigging. internal treason is the reason. self inflicted sabotage. devs 2019 match manipulation mindset: year rigging went full throttle: “how can we condition what’s left of our evaporating playerbase to accept auto losses and insta wins? let’s vault away OW1 so players can’t see that they were NEVER 10W 10L players”. let’s hide rank emblems, let’s hide player career profiles, to make rigging less obvious. that way hopefully players blame each other instead of us". the fact that many rounds end with the highest elims being around a dozen elims or less is irrefutable proof of rigging. them minimum elims BEFORE rigging rampage which began 2019 was 30 elims. the minimum. ow should be discontinued. no ow is better than rigged ow. the issue is devs and publisher think they are smarter than players.

While these are all POSSIBLE manipulation techniques, we don’t know it for sure.

I don’t doubt that they could do something like this, but I don’t know if they actually do these specific things.

People that say “the developers said XYZ, therefore there is no discussion regarding XYZ” are fools. How many times has Google said something, and a source code leak revealed that they were lying through their gold-coated teeth?

They should be more transparent about the inner workings of the matchmaker and be open to change by listening to the community (at least the ones that don’t have half their brain molten by now). “Oh people will abuse it”, wake up sheeple, people will exploit systems whether it’s closed or open source. Why do you think a Linux CVE is much rarer than a Windows one, despite Linux being open source and Windows closed source?

TL;DR: Think for yourself, don’t just accept one side or the other. There is always some truth in both sides.

i do. if you’re new you won’t. if you’re an exotic exceptional you know. most of whom uninstall. to keep it ultra simple and vivid: all that’s occurring, to facilitate one sided predetermined artificial outcomes, is nerfing the team’s heal and damage, who is slated for auto loss. TO ARTIFICIALLY MAKE THEM LESS EFFECTIVE AND LESS LIKELY TO PREVAIL. the same way a host can nerf players in custom lobbies. its not astrophysics. its fraudulence. that the secret sauce to forced auto loss. aka 50/50 hamster wheel.

1 Like

Do you mean you’re confused by this? I’m just saying that we shouldn’t believe people just because they say it is so. I don’t have time for a good analogy but for example when doctors said smoking cigarettes is good for you, we believed them. When Google said they don’t consider metrics like backlinks and average time on site/whatever, they lied as the leaks revealed.

apparently you’re new, so…

applies to YOU not me. clearly you don’t know who i am. i predict winners and losers. just bc i cited another user, who is also aware of the rigging doesn’t mean i’m copying THEIR mindset. untangle YOUR mind. after all i’ve said you think i’m a copycat. massive mindlessness.

the two aspects/sections from that user that i shared with you, is what i knew long before i knew of that users existence.

i shared it bc i’m IN AGREEANCE WITH IT. no one is forcing you to believe anything. multilayered rigging is at play.

I didn’t call you out on anything you imbecile. Stop acting like some Himalayan monk

wow, that is so true. The lack of respect shown to the players is amazing.

i have every right to point out your disingenuous contradictory. you go from

TO

delusional dimwit. the section i share is what i agree with. and i already knew they’ve been rigging for half decade. odds are, based on your reply, you clicked on it, became overwhelmed, with the other info listed, even though i only shared 2 specific sections.

Kind of a good point

no point talking to this guy, if you keep throwing stuff at a wall, something is eventually going to stick, thats all hes done so far

Maybe we should throw him against a wall