My proof the SR is broken

People keep saying that you aren’t bringing proof that SR is broken. Don’t worry about it. They have no evidence that it isn’t. At least you have anecdotes. They have nothing. And people get the 150 game number because 90% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Probably same amount per season if the META changes effect your hero pool much.

Otherwise not nearly as much.

If you don’t even play 50 games a season your SR is meaningless though.

2 Likes

No the 150 thing was calculated based on impact in a match with 12 people.

1 Like

Ok. So get better???

Your “evidence” means nothing if you’re only taking 5 matches as a sample. If you can CLIMB out of Bronze, then you’re better than Bronze. If you placed silver and can maintain it, then it just means you CAN maintain silver. Whether you can maintain it or even better, climb out of it is the question. A passenger surviving in the backseat of a racing car doesn’t mean you’re able to take the wheel and win with it. You’re confusing being passive and being the factor of your wins. 5 match really means nothing.

Also no offense, but 1.1 and 1.6 is barely different. Most people start at gold-plat unless they’re terrible at their mechanics. If you’re Gold and suddenly you place Diamond on a new account THEN that’s a definitive"proof" :smiley:

First, realize that it is approximate. Good or bad luck can make it take varying amounts of time. My measurements of this number aren’t particularly precise. I mainly throw it out there so that people can realize that you can’t reach a conclusion about mistakes in the rank system from a small number of games.

I have a number of data points: A while back, I had a silver account and a gold account. I played 100 games on each, and they still weren’t the same rank. Overwatch Forums. The silver account did eventually catch up the gold account, but that was after I stopped playing the gold account.

Patman recently did a similar experiment, in which it took him 119 games to get close to his main’s rank. Realistic climbing speed / getting to where you belong

Finally, I did a sophisticated simulation of the entire ranking system, and found that after a full reset, it would take about 150 games for the system to stabilize with everyone’s ranks approximately correct. https://www.reddit.com/r/OverwatchUniversity/comments/aatezy/why_match_quality_is_frequently_poor/

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=burden+of+proof&s=g

Don’t really feel like tying out the long list again which I have done in other posts. You can search for it.

Is it batman?

Some time ago, on another troll acc I played as bad as possible. Was placed 2200 :roll_eyes:

I’m assuming this account had already previously been placed bronze. Placements don’t matter, you can play as good or bad as you want in all 5 and you’ll still be placed roughly where you ended in previous seasons, give or take maybe 200 SR. You played well against BRONZE players.

Well yeah, on a fresh account, it starts you in placements around gold, which is pretty average. You played poorly because you were against gold and silver players. 5 games isn’t enough for it to immediately place you where you belong on a fresh account, it’s super hard to legitimately place bronze if you’re trying to win. Look as it like the fresh account started in gold and because you played so poorly, you dropped down to silver and that’s where you placed. Given more time, you’d continue to probably lose until you get to where you belong.

Okay so I’m a damage main I main Doomfist, Junkrat, and Sombra I grinded 55 matches won most of them 40-45 lost my last 10-15 and I went down from 1402 to 907 sr does that prove anything? I just think matchmaking is dumb as well since I got put it with Maybe a silver and then about people who were 1000-1200sr and when I lost my first 5 games about 1200 I got matched up with people who are 900 sr. This is just proof that the sr system is broken.