All are welcome to speak their OW-related opinions, but that said, one would hope after going on two years of complaints, players would find a way to move on to other characters or other games
Factually, a hero that lacks impact in a game where other heroes have impact would be considered to be imbalanced
The good news here is that Mercy has plenty of impact, which is essential to ensuring she is balanced, which she is at the present time
Tiny changes like Geoff referred to wont unbalance her, assuming they are made at all (Geoff made no promises)
In my opinion, and without blushing, she is in the best state of balance she has ever been in right now, in her current state; and as such, further changes should be very very limited or not made at all
Haven’t you heard if you crusade hard enough even the devs will learn they have no idea how to balance their own game and that Mass Rez was the best thing to happen to the game?
I had wondered why this user changed accounts all of the sudden (old acct was Profile - RevertMercy-1304 - Overwatch Forums) , but I had thought that the forum rules didnt allow a given individual to set up a new account to circumvent a ban…so I am not sure if this really is what occurred
I believe this was similar to the point of the forum raid as conducted by the leadership of the revertmercy/reworkmercy (same toxic/entitled deal, different packaging) group - if you make statements enough times, in a large enough number of threads, they become more true
While you have every right to your opinion and every right to reply to people, I want us to agree and disagree. I already know your opinion from the last 10 replies to my comments. I don’t really need you to comment on every single comment I post. I would appreciate it if you would stop as I want to have discussions with different people rather than one person ALWAYS replying to me. I don’t mean to sound rude and I don’t know how else to say it but you’re really annoying so please leave me alone. Thank you.
Every post one makes in a public forum is an implicit invitation to be responded to, particularly when statements that are made include extreme positions and/or derogatory remarks, which appear to be in both of your recent posts
One does not get to choose who responds in a public forum like this
I do not find anything I have stated to be annoying - I simply responded to statements that were made
I will add here that - factually - I have not responded to “every single comment” you have posted
Read my first sentence. I do acknowledge that you can and have the right to reply. Nothing you said was annoying, what is annoying is the fact that every comment I have made on Mercy post you feel the need to tell me your opinion when you have already done so several times. Factually, you have indeed responded to every comment I have made on a Mercy post. I really don’t need to know your opinion on every Mercy post I comment on.
Then do so, I’m just asking you stop replying to my comments because I already know your opinion and I really don’t need you to state it over and over again. I’d rather agree to disagree. You can still reply to them, I can’t force you not to, I am simply asking you not to. That is, if it’s something different rather than just repeating yourself then that’d be cool to hear. Since it hasn’t been I don’t care to read something you’ve already said.
And Im not telling you that you can’t reply to me. I am asking that you don’t, if you chose to then you chose to. No one is forcing you not to reply. If you decide to reply to me after I ask you not to, that’s kinda weird and petty for one but like go ahead. I am done replying to you from this point forward. If you decide to reply to this or any future comments, which you can, I will just ignore.