"It's my teammates' fault" has become "it's the matchmaker's fault"

Taking all bets on what the next trend for scapegoating your losses will be.

Hackers?
Botters?
Smurfs? (Kind of had this for a while)
Latency?
Lack of ultrawide support?
Lack of Zenyatta lore?

9 Likes

This has been, and always will be, the biggest, blaring balance issue to ever exist. It is absolutely appalling this hasn’t been addressed

11 Likes

Bad Developers.

Done. Root cause. The source of all issues.

7 Likes

Being killed by Brigitte

1 Like

If I get into a game. Someone tilts on my team and leaves… who is at fault?

If I get matched into your game (hypothetically) and play Genji into a brig, moira, winston, zarya and mei… would you (and the team) just let me do what I want? Hint: it would be my fault for being an idiot and not switch.

If your argument is “gut gud and you will climb” then we should stop 100% posts about anything in the game including any OP or underpowered heroes. After all, nothing matters because if you’re good, you’ll climb. Give bastion 90% damage reduction… Dont complain. If you’re good, you’ll climb.

Point is, there are lots of factors that make the climb just plain frustrating. Hackers, throwers, leavers, playing against OP heroes, etc.

3 Likes

The game can be rigged and climbing can be possible. They aren’t mutually exclusive, and not everyone who wants more even matches is concerned about raising their SR. It’s a straw man.

8 Likes

Blizzard please delete brig. She is the source of everything wrong with this game.

1 Like

I find it funny you take the devil’s advocate approach to this. How much collective SR have people lost to randomly DCs or server shutting down “unexpectedly”. Not everyone has the best system. You’d probably be surprised that intel integrated graphics can actually run this game. Not well, mind you, but playable enough that I’ve done it for four years.

I just played a round only to be met with an unexpected server crash. We were halfway into a game and it most likely booted everyone. It isn’t so much complaining about losing than it is about the actual game. I think most people want a better sandbox to play in and Blizzard doesn’t want to balance this delicate ecosystem. I also feel like within the four years of this game being out they don’t like to explore re-doing anything they think is perfect. Maybe the map design is just flawed. Maybe 2cp should be changed into a better mode that doesn’t have aggressive point spawn delay mechanics to be fair.

Do you people not know what the word “rigged” means? If you can consistently win, then its clearly not rigged. By definition

Its like claiming the blackjack table is fixed while the person right next to you is counting cards and robbing the house blind.

2 Likes

It’s more like playing a digital version of roulette where black comes up 53% of the time instead of 50%. They need plausible deniability or people conclude it’s unfair and game suffers. Just enough abuse of psychology to increase revenue, without making it blatant.

2 Likes

If youre comparing ow games to roulette, you dont understand one of the two. Or both. Or analogies.

Roulette is about chance. If you honestly think rank is up to chance, youre completely detached from the reality of how this game works.

If you were somehow incapable of making your own luck in this game, people wouldnt smurf and they wouldnt boost. They wouldnt even be able to.

2 Likes

But why would Blizzard favor some and not others? Rigging a multiplayer game implies rigging against and for a certain group of people.

1 Like

Be gone with your logic!

1 Like

If it’s being rigged(again, hypothetical, because we have no proof for OR against it), it’s not for or against anyone. The matchmaker isn’t trying to keep people down(or up). Rather, it’s trying to slow mobility to keep people playing longer. Blizzard doesn’t care if you’re in silver, diamond, or GM. They care if you’re keeping their game alive(and buying lootboxes).

This would be accomplished by offsetting your trends with players on opposing ones to make a game as even as possible. This results in as close to a 50-50 game as possible, whether or not you’re at your real SR. If you’re wondering how this is rigging, I go into more depth here:

Again, I’m not claiming this is absolutely the case, simply posing a theory. There is quite a bit of reason for Blizzard to have such a system from a financial standpoint.

3 Likes

I forgot to add one: 5G

2 Likes

lack of the lack
Beyond of lack.
So deep in the lack that lack has come out of lack to multiply itself…

Y’know, people act like smurfs aren’t a big issue, but as someone who plays support in comp exclusively, I get a lot of team mates confirming they’re smurfs when I offer to pocket any smurfs as Mercy.

Lower ranks are just “whoever has the better smurf wins.” The Diamond ranked smurfs get rolled by the GM smurfs and then blame team mates for being the ones stopping them from winning. They say “It’s not me! I’m a Diamond smurf that just bought this level 25 account! YOU ALL have to be the problem!”

I swear though, a smurf that’s on a losing team is more likely to rage and outright throw compared to a legit ranked player (and by throw I mean deliberately leaving, sitting in spawn, etc.)

6 Likes

Actually just yesterday I had a match (in silver) where one DPS claimed to be a smurf and demanded the other dps give him genji. Then he also demanded that I pocket him (I was mercy) and kept threatening to throw if people didnt comply. He didnt actually throw, and I never checked his profile to confirm if he was a smurf or anything, but you might be onto something.

3 Likes

Devs lack of effort and updates

1 Like

I don’t understand why the developers are not working on a freely accessible interface through which ALL MATCH DATA can be retrieved in a standardized format.
That would eliminate so much confusion.

Instead, projects such as Pursuit.gg, which actually showed relevant information in comparison to Overbuff, are forced to stop.

If everything is fine with the matchmaker, it should be no problem to simply look at 10000 records objectively and prove that.

3 Likes