That is actually the goal. To make the battlepass appears as a good deal compared to other stuff so more people buys it.
5 Likes
Which is purely optional.
Buy anything from a company its a donation.
Iām talking WoW pre ActivisionBlizzard. Activision - then led by Kotick - wanted an MMO in his portfolio, and nothing was bigger than WoW back then. So he bought Vivendi who at that time owned Blizzard, closed down Vivendi and created ActivisionBlizzard.
Sadly he won. Not only is OW2 is going to make billions. He is also going get few more yachts, a mansion and what not. Thx you whales.
4 Likes
Nothing wrong with being an older gamer (Iām 50) - but yeah, donāt feed the trolls 
4 Likes
Thatās kinda how business works. I mean I am absolutely no fan of Koticks, butā¦
he is the reason we even have Overwatch. It was his support when Project Titan failed and they were reviewing the character designs that he liked them so much (IIRC specifically Torb) that he greenlit the project to make Overwatch.
Most of the money will not go to Kotick, and in fact over time will go to Microsoft.
You are free of course to start your own game company and join him on his yacht if you can manage it.
Pretty sure everyone prefers how easy it was to get cosmetics with lootboxesā¦ but not if it comes at the cost of the game not steadily releasing playable content after 3-4 years, we want new playable content forever
The new monetization system is worth getting steady content for the next decade
When you can refute what I say with reason and facts please do so, otherwise you are the troll.
People like to express ideas and sentiments here in a group therapy circle and without challenge to their feelings. If you canāt justify your feeling, well, you are just being subjective and arbitrary.
Meanwhile the actual game platform thatās aimed at young people (Roblox) is filled with gambling especially one of the biggest games āAdopt Meā
At peak times 4m people are on only 14% of the playerbase is over 25 
To me the cosmetics pricing is more ridiculous than locking a hero. It blows my mind how so many people think charging as much for 2 video game outfits as a pair of real Levis costs is acceptable.
They could sell skins for $1 or $2 a pop and still make a killing. This is highway robbery.
26 Likes
The point was this is all we heard about the evils of loot boxes - now you see what you get as an alternative. Then they complain about that. It never ends.
But will it tho?
They dont lose anything important if they dont spend money
Cosmetics arent mandatory
2 Likes
Oh my bad, didnāt realise that what you mean, sorry xD
1 Like
Never forget you are the eminent Moira player I actually respect on this forum.
1 Like
This game will be lucky to last 2 years before it gets the Heroes of the Storm treatment.
12 Likes
Thatās a good joke lol
Tbh I would rather take the 3 OW skins. Not a big fan of Elden Ring.
1 Like
Sure, keep telling yourself that
Canāt believe itās gonna be $20 lol
I sure hope that Moira gets barely any skins bcs sheās hated 
Every time you get tempted by a skin shove $20 on steam, youāll have enough to buy any games you want by the time the Christmas sale comes LOL
I want that new FF game but itās Ā£70 on Steam, and then goes on sale for Ā£50ā¦ LOL Iād rather buy that ngl
2 Likes
Sure. Large scale research tends to work. Meta studies over MANY large scale research projects tend to work very well, you know, because stats.
If you want to mock people for basing their choices on science rather than ideology then go right ahead.
But, using the studies rather than trying to mock stuff with
āBuT THiNk AbOUt Da ChIlDrunzā
Is using facts and reason. They have the studies to back up what they do, they have the proof. You donāt.
Looks like I can refute what you say with reason and facts. So Iām not the troll.
5 Likes