Like increasing the comp requirements drastically, i understand. I always said the minimum should have been reaching level 100 atleast once and get your first prestige to be allowed in comp.
But given the ow1 requirement was level 25 i kinda feel like it would have been a nice minimum to have acess to all of the base roster without a limited pool/matchmaking and i’m kinda trying to evaluate if 100 matches would be about the same ammount required to get all 34 base heroes or if it would be absurdly worse.
I understand locking certain heroes to avoid people getting into overly complicated characters but i feel like there is a bit of a lack of trust? on the players here? But if they MUST go on with this i feel like level 25, which was initially deemed worthy enough to trust people to play comp with the whole roster, could perhaps be a good time for the player to start to get a grasp of the game without having to grind and go “yeah i get it by now”.
Seriously though, having to unlock the 20 base operators (even with dlc owned) was one of the worst aspect of R6 siege and splatoon realized it wasnt very fun to lock its weapons for such a long time either so they made the ticket system to offer the player to either get a weapon of their level or save up to get a weapon for ANY level.