Hard Truth: "Overwatch Killers" are a complete myth

This is a hard truth for everyone. It’s completely impossible for something new to topple something as well-established as Overwatch no matter how good it is. They’ll form their own playerbase, but many people will not take the risk of jumping to a completely new game vs a game that has been critically acclaimed in the past. That’s the tragic truth. Too many people know about Overwatch without paying attention to its flaws like the community does. This game will always have a strong playerbase. Overwatch 1’s critical success made sure of that.

The only, and I mean ONLY thing that can ‘kill’ Overwatch at this point are the people making it.

17 Likes

Overwatch is the biggest OW killer out there

65 Likes

Exactly. There are always going to be new games.

When New World came they said that was the next WOW killer. Where is new world now ?

1 Like

Overwatch 1 out performing ow 2 is the killer.

They fired a lot of staff so even if the devs wanted to surpass the original they don’t have the labor to reach past creative heights.

You don’t see threads on here constantly praising the awesome legendaries, new maps, new hero and so on.

Cutting their staff and having talent leave for other companies has drained the creativity out of this game.

Ow 2 won’t grow. At best it can retain hardcore players that are addicted to this game.

Everyone else is going to leave to play the new stuff with their friends.

7 Likes

Competition and rivalry is good, it drives change, blizzard has rested on it’s laurels for too long, that’s not to say that the game will kill overwatch (nothing, but Dev hubris will) but put pressure on the only thing blizz care about (bottom line) and it will drive change more than any boycott will.

10 Likes

There isn’t even a WoW killer even now, and WoW is a LOT older than OW. Sure FFXIV coexists with it, but it didn’t kill it.

Everyone’s been saying Concord will kill OW2, the problem with Concord is it’s on playstation/PC.

Lawbreakers 2 basically.

2 Likes

A debatle example of this can be seen with FF14 and WoW.

WoW for years has been the king of MMORPG’s however alot of changes where made over the years leading people to start growing more upset with WOW.

Then 2-4ish years ago, FF14 supassed WoW in player count. It was ground breaking.

Due to that alot of disscussions started apearing comparing the two.

And while i have little proof of this next part, I think that all that talk and comparison did something to the devs, because the next expansion Dragon Flight had alot more care put into it then previous expansions (at least IMO)

If always good to have rivals and competitions between games, it forces the devs to try and better.

On a side note, that is why I think Minecraft has been “failing” these past few years, it doesnt really have a good competitor, as such it seems like the devs are complacent (once again IMO)

3 Likes

The thing with MMOs is that they demand so much time investment that once a player becomes established it is hard to move on to another one, I played wow found it boring and repetitive and moved on to ESO, that game blows wow out of the water in my opinion (but that is because I like story and freedom)

It’s a bit different with shooter games because they are a dime a dozen and unless you are into comp and want to reach the big leagues overwatch does not require that time investment so it is much easier to move on from.

OW 1 was a private franchise.

OW 2 is owned by Microsoft with a 3 trillion with a capital T.

OW 2 killed OW 1.

OW 2 is here as long as Microsoft is.

These new games would be so much more successful then they already are if there words “Overwatch” and them weren’t put in the same sentence.

Helldiverse 2 and overwatch should never be put in the same sentence.

Palworld for whatever reason and overwatch never in the same sentence.

The finals and overwatch?

Hell even Marvel Rivals.

These games are completely irrelevant and none essential to the existence of overwatch that it’s an insult to them to think you have to compare them to something just to give them a leg up, yes overwatch is high quality weather we admit it or not even if its just for nostalgia reasons.

But if yall want a game to become popular don’t mention and especially don’t compare it to an already popular IP, because unless you basically create a brand new all new never before seen never heard of gaming experince, you’ll make your game just constantly look like its trying to be and play catch up to something better.

And at that point just play the already established better thing.

Overwatch can stop existing tomorrow and if your game can stand on its own that’s all that matters.

I mean you can attempt to interpret it that way, but the numbers say otherwise.

Both on the player count and the staff count differential between 1 and 2.

Ow 1 had more players. And those people had to actually drop money to play it. Team 4 was bigger.
Time skip

Today less players for a free game and less staff because Microsoft looked at the quarter revenue and it didn’t meet expectations.

2 Likes

OW 2 small company.

Look how much CoD brings in. Yall expecting too much from a F2P.

Call of Duty has significantly contributed to Microsoft’s financial growth following the acquisition of Activision Blizzard. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2024, Xbox content and services revenue surged by 62% compared to the previous year, largely due to the inclusion of Activision Blizzard’s games, including Call of Duty. This increase helped boost Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue by 51% during the same period. The success of Call of Duty and other titles from Activision Blizzard has played a crucial role in Microsoft’s strong financial performance, which saw total revenue reaching $61.9 billion for the quarter.

Nah. It is possible. The current competition is just not good enough except maybe for Valve (their game doesn’t look good but it probably won’t launch in a bad state anyway)

haven’t they already?

1 Like

Can you all define what killing a game is ?

let me see:
-being the worst game on steam
-having less players than the competition
-making less money than the competition

I don’t know why people insist on every potential hero shooter (or any game) has to be an “Overwatch Killer”. Drives me nuts.

Competition is good. OW2 isn’t going anywhere no matter how bad it gets practically. But competition could lead to improvements in OW2.

If you’re just hoping to see OW2 completely “die” it ain’t happening.

6 Likes

You have 5k post on a game that is dead.

help me understand how that works ?

1 Like

What does forum has to do with playing the game.

Also this is just my smurf.

not sure I even logged in OW when I was not playing.

You seem to spend a lot of time on forum on the game that is dead as per you.

Clearly you don’t have any other game that is why you are here ?

Just my logic here.

Who is smurfing on a dead game ? Again not you ?

1 Like