The fact that McCree is so OP rn that the forum is resounding with calls to nerf him prove winrate is no reason on its own to buff a hero
It proves it to the masses, but I still maintain that yes, whether a hero performs is kind of important. Crazy, I know. I get that a lot when I point out common sense.
More like common assumption.
Winrate math is so distorted, that itâs practically worthless.
But you got people acting like it means something.
This is from a guy who has been having frequent email exchanges with the Overbuff website developer.
Itâs also common sense to actually read the post youâre replying to; I said win rate on its own
Donât worry, the developers that design games for a living have accurate numbers. Hence why he hasnât been addressed and why anytime they caved to the hive mind, he was gifted rapid and substantial compensation buffs.
We can pretend he needs big nerfs all we want, but if and when he gets touched, I promise you it will be very slight, probably a revert. And if I am wrong, I am still right because they will hit em with the clean compensation buffs like always.
Youâre telling me 2 mccrees on the same match will result in one winning and one losing, therefore 50% winrate?
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
đ¤Ż
Itâs arrogance like this that will get Fan The Hammer put on a cooldown
The developers have previously pointed out that they donât use winrate, as we see it, because they exclude mirror matches.
Which by itself is an extreme amount of data distortion on a hero with such a high usage rate.
Then you got the Overbuff devs confirming that usage rates are based on time. Which means a hero thatâs good for quick rounds on Attack, but doesnât create long rounds on Defence, has an artificially low winrate.
Donât mind me but i actually think this is a very useless nerf
Idk why people are suggesting it
That is such a baby nerf that I believe it. That is the exact kind of change I am expecting.
Itâs bizarre how math like that is ignored by people with winrate arguments.
As if math is unimportant when talking about numbers.
I ignore it for two reasons, firstly, your own claim that the math is shoddy. Funny how that is all of a sudden not relevant, and furthermore because heroes who having much higher pickrates also have much higher winrates when they are dominant. Especially relative to the class of heroes. It is pretty easy to ignore when all heroes have the math applied under the same circumstances. There isnât a secret McCree equation, fam.
The people who force that 50/50 logic are the ones ignoring the data. Bias will be bias.
It was never relevant.
The distortion isnât relevant? K. Interesting 180.
Itâs perfectly normal to change your understanding of something when you see new compelling evidence.
This is from a guy who has been having frequent email exchanges with the Overbuff website developer.
At this point Robotwizards post should just be pinned so everyone actually understands how Overbuff works.
Hmm, then I guess heroes with high win rates with low use rates are just high because theyâre one tricked only when they find it optimally. Like Torbjorn or Bastion, then players just swap when it doesnât work.
Yup, and because they tend to extend the duration of the match giving them more playtime on a specific hero, and get switched off quickly of they arenât working.
Just sayin the whole 50% winrate argument doesnât work for McCree because heâs only played 50% of the time
Thereâs Reinhardt whoâs played 75% of the time and is sitting on a 52% WR which may indicate that heâs winning extra games where the other team isnât running Reinhardt
But McCree is only winning 49% of the time, being picked around 50% of games which can be an indication that the team that isnât picking him is more likely to win
I know people will argue that people swap to him when theyâre losing but honestly I think McCree is vastly overrated in comparison to cries for him to be nerfed, he really isnât the monster that people claim he is
If it was simply âpick McCree and win when the other team doesnât play himâ then he would definitely have a higher win rate, I do think McCree (alongside Tracer) do need to be nerfed, but I also think people are far too quick to complain and are vastly over exaggerating his strength
As long as people are so blind as to believe this there will never be progress.