Battle Pass/Shop hurt this game

When Overwatch 1 came out I paid $40 for the game and I was able to earn anything in the game that I wanted by playing the game and spending the points I earned. Now, I can pay $40 and get 2 skins and an emote. Basically the only way to unlock skins now is to buy the battle pass or buy them from the shop (at a ridiculous price). This change also makes the seasonal events like Summer Games, Halloween Terror, Anniversary etc. less exciting because the main focus of those events were the event-themed skins that are now also locked behind a paywall. I would love it if I could EARN skins again instead of having to buy them. I understand the game is F2P but there needs to be some other form of in-game currency that you don’t have to spend real money on. As it stands right now there is practically zero reward for your time spent playing the game.

Also while I’m on the topic of F2P/Battle pass: People who bought Overwatch 1 for $40-$60 should’ve been given some coins or the first Battle Pass for free.

8 Likes

Well, guess I’ll post the image again.

9 Likes

If Activision-Blizzard wanted to put out content for the game for 3+ years and thought $40 per game wasn’t enough to do it, then they probably should have charged more for it up front.

Buying the game is player financing. Which many players did already when we bought Overwatch.

2 Likes

I wouldn’t mind paying for a skin if it was like $5 instead of $20, which is half the price I paid for the first game.

3 Likes

Let’s not pretend that OW1 didn’t make any money with cosmetic sales :roll_eyes:

3 Likes

Well part of that is fewer buyers equals higher prices.
The other part is that I almost think they don’t want you to use the cash shop, and would prefer you use the BattlePass.

Kinda like with OWL, they preferred you watch the OWL games, rather than just pay $10 a per skin.

It’s a lost cause. It’s best to just find a new game at this point. The whole gameplay loop of fun and reward is gone and it is never coming back.

4 Likes

Yeah I guess we’re just gonna ignore Loot Boxes for the sake of the argument lol

1 Like

I really don’t think we deserved anything for free from owning a 6 year old game. Would I take free stuff sure, but we got so many hours out of ow1 for such a small price. It was so consumer friendly.

2 Likes

They should have set some expectation explicitly. Such as we are going to make skins and whatever for 3 years after the release of Overwatch 1. After which we are going to make Overwatch 2 that also costs $40 to fund the next 3 years of stuff.

I would have bought that game if that was the case. Instead we got this F2P battlepass garbage that costs $100 a year instead of $15 a year like it used to. That huge increase in cost is extremely offputting to a huge number of people. They highly misjudged what people were willing to pay for here.

2 Likes

Monitization is one thing. It’s fine to seek compensation. However at this point we aren’t talking about compensation. It’s gouging that is both, what we have problems with, and what’s going on.

$20 skins are gouging. $20 for a skin and pretending its discounted instead of marked up, is gouging us, while insulting to our intelligence at the same time.

People have issues with how disrespectful of people’s time Blizzard’s pricing is. If a skin cost’s “$xyz.00” to make, and they expect to sell “ABC” number of those skins, the the a reasonable price would be $(‘xyz’/‘ABC’)

Blizzard’s policy of saying “screw that noise, +2,000% mark up!” rubs many people the wrong way.

(This also doesn’t even mention that Blizzard pricing their products outside of their customer’s reach is a risky business strategy to say the least. As they say, you attract more flies with honey than with treating-your-flies-with-thinly-veiled-contempt.)

10 Likes

Well I’ll agree that charging big prices for old skin is pretty weird.

But as far as pricing goes otherwise, have you seen Valorant/Apex skin pricing?

I have no intention of looking that up, but pointing out other people making the same terrible choices is not justification.

5 Likes

China’s free speech situation is appalling and they need legal reform.

“But as far as free speech goes, have you seen Iran’s policies?” Regardless of what Iran does, Chinese people deserve to speak freely.

Regardless of how poorly EA treats Apex players, Overwatch’s customers deserve to be treated with a certain degree of respect.

2 Likes

So do you think Aaron Keller or somebody below him is deciding the overall pricing model?

Or is it somebody above Aaron Keller at ActiBliz Corporate.

Yes I have, which is why I’ve never bought anything from those shops either. What’s your point?

3 Likes

Overwatch should have just copied Apex Legends.
Overwatch right now doesn’t reward you for your time spent playing the game.

3 Likes

It’s almost certainly a decision made by someone in a board room thats so* out of touch with the value of a dollar that they think $200 for a gallon of milk is what the going price is.

I don’t think it’s Aaron Keller. I suspect it’s some rich jerk that hasn’t worked an actual day in their life.

1 Like

Stop justifying a 20 bucks for a legendary, thanks

Monetization is fine but the prices are bs

Well, if not enough people buy the skins, then they will lower the prices.