Wow he must be broken because winrate at a given moment dictates strength all the time. Right guys? right?
23 Likes
Right
10 Likes
Congratulations, Bastion.
8 Likes
i mean, GM is currently stuck in double shield and bastions best meta is double shield so he should be at a maybe near or 100% win rate. that or he’s being played so less that 1 person won with him and he’s at a 100% win rate which wouldnt be surprising
5 Likes
Time to finally nerf Bastion.
23 Likes
I guess it’s time to remove bastion /s
14 Likes
Nah man keep the s to yourself
From,
a doom main
3 Likes
My beautiful boy is finally getting the recognition he deserves.
5 Likes
Okay then nerf him problem solved
19 Likes
Sounds like only one player reached GM rank on Bastion and hence now they have a 100% winrate, gz to whoever that one dude is 
It’s a big feat to achieve
4 Likes
This is how the forum uses stats.
Doom overtook ashe look turns out ashe has been trash this whole time and doomfist has been ruining games for years.
2 days later…
Ashe is above Doom again. Huh.
11 Likes
This is ridiculous we need nerfs. Such a niche hero should not be viable in grandmaster.
/s
3 Likes
Exactly
1 Like
We are so out of things to talk about.
3 Likes
Probably some teams rolling double sheild and having a mercy pocket him. It’s corny but it still works. just like other cancer such as pharmercy.
1 Like
his pick rate is literally 0,02%.
theres difference between stats from a character thats literally used all the time and stats of a character who was used like 2 times. 1000 games vs 2 games. theres a reason anytime they do some science research they do millions of tests instead of just 2.
stop trying to use some completely irrelevant claims to try and make it seem like winrates overall (proper winrates, not that 0,02% pickrate bastion) dont mean anything. cause they do.
2 Likes
Like gold medals measure skill.
Only notice now?
1 Like
Not at all, ive been talking about it for a minute. I’ve probably made more posts on the subject then your entire amount of posts
2 Likes
If he was at 100% with a decent pick rate for an extended period of time, yes. But you’re probably looking at 2 matches for today, you can’t look at two matches for a single day and say its at 100%.
You’re abusing statistics to say statistics isn’t correct, the thing is the average person understands a sample size of 2 is difference than 1000.