Well, I actually agree with the latter part of the sentence. Discussing a character being OP without exploring why isn’t contributing anything. I fully agree with that. Because there’s a lot of different variations on OP, and everyone seems to get fixated on an idea that OP = unbeatable or unkillable, when in reality it’s a blanket term/classification for an entire range of issues and problems in the system. It’s like saying, “there’s a bee!”. Well, is it a honeybee? Hornet? Wasp? Bumble?
Well, because it was my focus, yes.
Yes. That precisely. Like you said earlier, statements without discussion exploring those statements isn’t helpful. I wanted your perspectives and solutions, because I love hearing people’s different approaches.
It used to be a common trope that people would group up together to discuss an idea or process, and they called it “brainstorming”. Because different people with different experiences having been involved in different situations and witnessing different solutions in their lives, all contribute varying (and sometimes conflicting) resolutions to an issue, but everyone gets to witness and learn from each other. If there’s going to be any value in having forums in the first place, it stems from that.
Well the entire point was to hear your stuff. What are you going to do to improve the situation, if you had control of the situation in the first place? The point isn’t for you to try and argue the fact that the situation exists in the first place.
…like you did right here. This is that unhelpful part. You telling the doctor that it’s entirely possible your child just runs at a higher body temp isn’t helping the situation.
No, because the crux of the matter is Ana being omnipresent due to being picked more than twice as much as the second-place support in three out of seven ranks, still highest by a wide margin in another three ranks, and tied for first-place in the final rank. Which means that whatever changes you propose here to alleviate the situation, they would have to make Moira’s pickrate go up by a factor of 2x to 11x across all ranks. Unless you’re genuinely godawful at balancing and have no faith in your own ideas, that’s not going to happen. And people complaining about trivial stuff isn’t the issue at play here. It’s people rightly pointing out a symptom of an issue and what you would do to remedy it.
Because the devs implied that to be a non-starter by doing the reverse of what you’d want. It’s like your boss telling you you’re not getting a raise, then two days later, you go and ask him for a raise. That’s already been discussed, you’re not getting a raise. What’s your next idea?
And it’s not that I’m personally shooting down the idea of reversing those nerfs, I’m just stating that ideas about reversing them are likely to not get any traction because it used to be the status quo in the first place, and they moved away from that. It’s fine if your solution is to simply reverse the nerfs that set this situation in motion - just say that is your preferred solution.
There’s lot of options on the table. But I asked you for yours, and you ended the discussion with saying that you don’t believe that jet fuel can melt steel beams and dismissed the discussion out of hand. We can’t have the discussion in an intelligent way when your response is < see no evil>[speak no evil]{hear no evil}.
I literally gave you my word that I wanted to hear your solutions on the matter, and your response was, “what problem?” How do you stand there and lament that people don’t rationally discuss issues then turn around and plug your ears when asked to be a part of that very discussion??