𝓟𝓲𝓷𝓴 Mercy (you can get it)

[Octo24-2955]

@Chiana-21849

Sure, I’ll believe you, just like I believed the guy trying to sell me a bridge?

nice way of avoiding every single one of my points. I see you have nothing important to say.

@Chiana-21849

It’s really bad play to keep dragging BCRF and breast cancer into this so that Blizzard will feel pressured/guilty enough to run the event again.

12.7 million dollars went to BCRF regardless if people cared about it or not.

Do you have a real reason why it shouldn’t come back? If BCRF doesn’t want to then that’s fine

[OzzYBWild-2739]

I am baffled how many people aren’t content with being completely toxic and cancerous in the game now and spread their hatred into the forums with topics like this, which are created for the sole purpose of trolling, spreading toxicity and causing unnecessary drama.

You want Pink Mercy? Okay, make a thread, maybe they bring it back, I’d be for it.
You have Pink Mercy? Okay, you’re in the same boat as me, awesome.
You don’t want/have Pink Mercy and just want to stir more toxicity? Okay, be quiet and please just leave.

[Megadodo-11847]

@GeoGhostX-1391

the actual pink mercy skin is not coming back.

thats not what Blizzard has said, actually

[Chiana-21849]

Absolutely. I think it’s shameful how they hide their desire for a cosmetic behind caring about BCRF/breast cancer. Their guilt tripping isn’t going to work on a company like Blizzard. It’s all they have as a reason to beg for it to return and as mentioned, if it wasn’t originally linked to a charity they’d no legit reason to keep posting about it.

[Octo24-2955]

@Angel-2298

And how do you know they didn’t? See? This is not a real argument: it’s not falsifiable and leads to meaningless self-referential clauses.

It’s just as meaningless as saying “You don’t care about the cause you just want the skin to be back!”

@Angel-2298

Bottom line: if someone wants to donate, they donate. It’s really impossible to argue for the return of the skin (or anything else) out of charitable causes because there are ways to donate without skins or anything. The goal behind any ask for return of the skin is … return of the skin so that it’s an obtainable item. Let’s not substitute the goal with a side-effect.

I mean, it still raised almost 13 million regardless if people cared or not so…

@Angel-2298

Just to be clear: there’s nothing wrong with wanting the skin to return. But it’s at the best of times disingenuous to claim that the reason is some “noble cause” because it simply isn’t by the very fact the main ask is for an item, not the charity.

You’re not wrong, but there’s also a lot of pink mercy owners who get on their high horse pretending that they bought it for a good cause while viewing everyone else who wants it to come back as evil

[Ninetales-2114]

@Megadodo-11847

thats not what Blizzard has said, actually

I think “Actually” Thats exactly what they said.

https://i.imgur.com/8iHJrtv.jpg

[Angel-2298]

I’m baffled at how many people think they know better and start naming and claiming before they even care to read. This post was flagged already. Falsely so. The moderation team rejected the flags and reinstated it. It is officially conforming to the ToS and the Rules of Conduct. Get over it.

[Chiana-21849]

@Octo24-2955

nice way of avoiding every single one of my points. I see you have nothing important to say.

I didn’t avoid your “points”; you only had one in summary: “Pink Mercy should come back for another charity run because some people care about both the skin and charity.”

That’s the same message every pink mercy requester uses.

[Megadodo-11847]

@HULK-23345

They can but the simple fact of the matter is that people by their very nature will be more motivated to donate with an incentive unfortunately or not. We can’t control human nature but we can bring back the pink mercy skin can’t we?

The really interesting thing about this is that there are people who will reply to this saying “you can just donate” and yet those same individuals have to know that the charity itself worked with Blizzard to get this incentive to donate created in the first place

the charity itself accepts that some people want/need to be incentivized and yet some forum members dont accept it

@Octo24-2955

I hope one day they do bring it back!

Many of us do.

@Slayenem-1955

They want the skin because of it’s exclusivity

there may be some folks who feel this way

however, while it is implied in this statement that everyone feels this way, this simply isnt the case

@Slayenem-1955

if they had got it back then, all of them would be completely silent right now

all of us would be silent?

not at all

I would be talking about making this skin available again regardless

and I am far from alone

@Slayenem-1955

not one of these people would be preaching about doing more charity events “for the cause”.

I and others have actually been quite vocal about wanting more/other charity offers to be made

@Slayenem-1955

I’m not that much of a scumbag to use dead family members as tool to win arguments or guilt trip.

I dont know of anyone who has done that

@Slayenem-1955

The amount of times I see people try to use the dead as an excuse to obtain Pink mercy is just disgusting.

I have yet to see this happen in any Pink Mercy thread

What I have seen is individuals who want the skin to return being accused of not caring about the cause and having to defend themselves from such claims. In such cases, it is perfectly legitimate to tell such an accuser about folks one has lost and.or watched suffer as a result of BC> it doesnt become an excuse at all, and the only part that can reasonably be called disgusting in such scenarios is the accuser who is making a baseless attack on others

@Slayenem-1955

They use manipulation and guilt as a way to steal something that stands for wellness, charity, and purity. They only want to serve their own greed and don’t care about the virtues the skin stood for. If these people cared OH SO much about charity, then go donate right now and shut it.

These are baseless accusations against people that are almost certainly folks you do not know at all, much less well enough to make such an accusation

@Octo24-2955

Why can’t someone both want the skin and want to create a fundraiser which made millions?

sadly, a lot of the attackers want to have us believe that the two are mutually exclusive, when in fact they are not

[Angel-2298]

@Ninetales-2114

I think “Actually” Thats exactly what they said.

https://i.imgur.com/8iHJrtv.jpg

Not acknowledging the facts / interpreting them to fit the agenda is just the usual mental gymnastics the members of the cult do to keep their hope alive so that threads complaining about the thing they want can live another day.

[KrissiVector-1258]

@Octo24-2955

I see you have nothing important to say.

No no. You dont decide what is important and what isnt.

@Octo24-2955

Do you have a real reason why it shouldn’t come back?

A reason on top of discouraging people who have been proven to donate from ever donating again, due to being intentionally misled? I dont think there needs to be another reason.

@Chiana-21849

I think it’s shameful how they hide their desire for a cosmetic behind caring about BCRF/breast cancer.

Agreed. And they always claim sayinf they dont care is baseless, even though saying that they do care is just as baseless.

[Ocelot-11840]

loving it

[OzzYBWild-2739]

@Angel-2298

I’m baffled at how many people think they know better and start naming and claiming before they even care to read. This post was flagged already. Falsely so. The moderation team rejected the flags and reinstated it. It is officially conforming to the ToS and the Rules of Conduct. Get over it.

The mods sharing the same toxic zoomer “humor” isn’t proving anything, after all they work for the same company that caused the whole drama and has a history of terrible treatment of their customers and ruining their own franchises.

It IS trolling as per the definition of it, the fact some mod unflagged this just shows how dire the situation on these forums is when mods obviously participate in the trolling and pour oil to the fire by backing up folks like you.

[Ninetales-2114]

I’m actually genuinely surprised nobody made a thread about HS’s mercy skin before. This thread is comedy gold so far.

[KrissiVector-1258]

@Megadodo-11847

the charity itself accepts that some people want/need to be incentivized and yet some forum members dont accept it

Nah dodo. You know very well we accept that. We are not against a new donation skin coming out. You were intentionally disingenuous here.

[Octo24-2955]

@Chiana-21849

“Pink Mercy should come back for another charity run because some people care about both the skin and charity.”

I mean, why would anyone oppose wanting to create an incentive for a BCRF regardless if people care or not?

@Chiana-21849

That’s the same message every pink mercy requester uses.

And you have the same “counter argument” that every pink mercy gatekeeper has.

@KrissiVector-1258

No no. You dont decide what is important and what isnt.

Great response 10/10

@KrissiVector-1258

A reason on top of discouraging people who have been proven to donate from ever donating again, due to being intentionally misled?

But why? Is the skin going to disappear from current owners accounts?

[Ocelot-11840]

@Octo24-2955

But why? Is the skin going to disappear from current owners accounts?

i actually out loud laughed thinking about this scenario

[Octo24-2955]

Yeah, like why are they so adamant? xD

I guess they don’t want their unique skin to be available again. Can’t think of any other reason tbh.

[KrissiVector-1258]

@Octo24-2955

But why? Is the skin going to disappear from current owners accounts?

Because many of us wouldnt have payed for the skin if we knew we could get the skin whenever we wanted.

@Octo24-2955

Great response 10/10

You: has nothing to contribute
Also you: attempts to respond anyway

[Angel-2298]

@OzzYBWild-2739

they work for the same company that caused the whole drama

And … how did they do that exactly? By making an event that enabled $12Mil+ donations none of which went to “their company”? Oh… sorry… of course they did a serious miscalculation - they didn’t foresee the entitlement of those who think just because they “want something” it “causes the drama”. Sure, sure.