interesting
this statement in essence says that you are a Blizzard employee who knows the details of their day to day operations
would you care to enlighten us all, and provide credentials proving that you have means to know the day to day operations of Blizzard?
2 Likes
can there just be a point where posts self delete if theyâre totally not going to lead anywhere
2 Likes
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
1 Like
are you speaking of posts where a forum member declares they have knowledge that they dont actually have?
Theyâre probably speaking of posts where certain forum members named dodo put words into other forum members mouths such as here:
1 Like
Even better proof for this:
2 Likes
Thanks. Iâll bookmark that too.
1 Like
No problem. Sadly they never address it.
1 Like
Iâm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here and assume that you want a genuine, civil exchange then. So returning to the discussionâŚ
Sure I can try to dig these up. Might take me a while.
Kindly explain the relevance of this?
Okay letâs try to find some of the quotes⌠Itâs hard to Google for this because so much of the info shows stuff from OW2 since thatâs all over the headlines now. Also the fact that the old forums were deleted. There are probably more recent examples of things that were planned or not in the plans, that they later went back on that arenât coming to my mind right now.
âRight now there are some technical challenges,â Blizzard game director Jeff Kaplan told me in a recent interview. âThe tech specs [on Switch] arenât quite there. It would be a non-trivial undertaking for us to make the game on Switch.â
âWeâre huge Nintendo fans,â Kaplan told me. âWe would absolutely love to see the game on something like Switch, itâs just not feasible currently.â
âOne of Nintendoâs most successful platforms is 3DS,â Kaplan said. âAnd watch how many times they upgraded that over time. You donât want to snap judge, you want to have the conversation, because we donât know whatâs in the plans. We want to understand what their plans are, because just because something might not be feasible now doesnât mean that at some point in the future it might be an option for us.â
Regarding crossplay:
Regarding locking heroes not being in the plans originally:
While there was rampant pre-release speculation that Overwatch would be a free-to-play title, the game launches this week as a standard, pay-once-play-forever multiplayer shooter. âThe reason we ended up going that way was that itâs so important to have access to every hero in the game, and in the middle of the match to swap to any other hero they think is necessary,â Keller explained. âIt was actually a game design decision, a balance thing. Sometimes you need a different hero on your team. Like if you really need a Widowmaker right now, you donât want everybody saying âI donât have Widowmaker!ââ
That same basic reasoning explains why Blizzard doesnât plan to charge for additional heroes and maps that will be released as DLC in the future. âWe want everybody to always be in the big same player pool and we donât want other players to feel like theyâre locked out of playing with their friends because they havenât bought a particular set of maps [or characters].â
This is a quote from then Assistant Game Director Aaron Keller in 2016.
__
Game was originally planned to be 6v6. Philosophy changed. Geoff Goodman answers question from Super on stream.
1 Like
Overwatch 2 originally planned to release with both PvE and PvP together, plan later changed with âdecouplingâ:
__
OW2 skins originally planned to be exclusive to OW2 owners, with OW2 originally planned to be a separate purchase. Iâll need to go back and look this one up. I believe it was stated somewhere around 2019 Blizzcon.
Now: all OW2 all hero redesigns free to all players.
i mean technically they canât be mad bc itâs A pink mercy skin, because yk itâs pink LMFAO
aand apparently this was flagged? LOL
3 Likes
Easily. With changes to gamemodes and such Blizzard does need to consult with an outside party. Itâs all internal because it is their game.
However things like Pink Mercy and Lego Bastion are collaborative efforts. This means that itâs not just Blizzardâs word to bring them back-it needs to be approved by the other party that was involved in the collaboration.
Thatâs the biggest difference to the examples of âthey said no death matchâ-because there was no other party that would prevent them, it was all internal.
Even the Switch example you gave was them not outright saying a port wouldnât go to it. It clearly states they wanted to wait to see where it goes. It would be pointless to port something to a system that either becomes obsolete or goes through any massive software updates.
They even admitted to making compromises to make it work. So again it wasnât flat out refusal just software limitations.
Again the others all are internal issues. Thereâs been no outside collaboration for these changes. Itâs why the weight of âno plans for Pink Mercy to returnâ holds more weight. Itâs not just a creation from Blizzard only.
1 Like
So if I understand correctly you believe that they need to have BCRFâs permission to re release the skin?
Why wouldnât they approve?
Even if they didnât approve the assets belong to Blizzard. Blizzard has the final say over whether they bring back the skin.
Itâs a collaboration-meaning both parts would need to agree. Itâs simple to understand. Again itâs why say if Lego Bastion would return both parties would need to approve it.
Same with the BCRF. Sure the model and character are Blizzard but the design and design elements for the skin maybe not be fully under their ownership for re-release.
1 Like
So youâre assuming that BCRF havenât agreed. Thatâs speculative, we donât know that do we?
By the way Andy never actually said that the skin would never return. All he said was that there are no plans for it to return, and it was in a thread about the anniversary remix event. He was talking about that event, he wasnât talking about it never returning ever.
Not even that, it all what that contract stipulates.
Iâve done freelance work and advertising work for charities and the contract for design assets can range from full rights, to limited rights (like the re-release argument), to shared rights.
Thatâs more than likely the reason for it not coming back.
2 Likes
you can get this super rare one time skin! jk heres an OWL skin that looks inferior. what im trolling? what eever do you mean? 0:) <topic creator
This, once again is speculation.
blizzard said this year they have no plans to bring it back