It’s not going to be perfect, of course, because exceptions must always exist.
Yeah…but it’s #8. That’s not a strong player there.
Again…#9 and 8. It’s in the top 10, but it’s just an outlier.
Same thing here.
If you look at it as a whole, because you must remember that exceptions do exist, you notice the pattern of where aggro generally stands. It’s not polarizing overall. This is because aggro is consistent, and it’s why aggro almost always sits at top of the meta. The polarizing decks for the most part share a theme.
Despite the fact that aggro/face sits at top of the meta (Face Hunter #1 per VS, and Taunt Druid #3) it doesn’t correlate and sit at top of the polarizing charts. That’s a big sign. The decks that do sit at the top share a very common theme.
So, in another thread, where I said that the problem with playing Control priest in the meta is that matches are very polarized, it makes complete sense. OTK and Combo decks really wreck Priest. They always have. Priest is ok in a meta where a couple of these decks exist, but when 5/6/7/8+ of them exist, it’s a Priest killer.