Only those within range 
1 Like
Why wouldnāt you want to get to the bottom of the election mishaps then? You think people scurrying in the night with ballots can be trusted without oversight?
Until HS devs come out and say āthe weight for draws is completely random like a shuffle like it should beā then I donāt believe it. Iāve seen way too much top draws that it seems like they use weighting on powerful swing cards. Whenever a card is shuffled into a deck, 85% of the time itās the next card. Find a different random number generator if you have to (if itās even unintentional). Let alone what you said that when you change decks it matches with the exact counter. (As if thereās more than just pure random going on). We already know that this game can weight things differently like the pity timers on card packs and when you discover thereās more chance of class cards/legendaries. We know they can code Zephrys to know certain conditions. I think theyāre using code like that to make hidden weighted random instead of actual basic random. If they are doing that and not telling anyone, affecting esports and peoplesā time, theyād have a LOT to answer for. I just want someone to go in and verify that for things that are supposed to be real random, that it is with no bogus weight. (Like when shaman is about to be dead and the only hope is to evolve their 9 cost into a colossal, it happens WAAAAY more than random would suggest, like the last 4 times in a row that Iāve played.) If they had hidden weight this whole time without telling anyone I would suggest Blizzard just shut down and hide in shame. They would owe anyone who competed in a tournament real money. Someone verify thereās no weight on draws because theyāve hid info before that things that were supposed to be random were weighted.
1 Like
preĀ·tenĀ·tious
/prÉĖten(t)SHÉs/
adjective
- attempting to impress by affecting greater importance, talent, culture, etc., than is actually possessed.
āa pretentious literary deviceā
āa pretentious poem which speaks of nothing in extravagant detail.ā
From my experience its always Yshaarj
Observe this sentence.
"Broken cards and power creep, incompetent designers; (Whom I believe could not collectively operate a parking meter.) "
Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with āheāā or ā'she,ā use who.
If you rewrote that sentence it should become the following sentence:
āBroken cards and power creep, incompetent designers; (I believe they could not collectively operate a parking meter.)ā
They is like he or she. <---- correct to use in that sentence
Them is like him or her. <---- not correct to use in that sentence
2 Likes
With that said, are you trying to accuse people who design games of not being able to operate a parking meter when youāre demonstrating an inability to construct a simple sentence?
If so! That is fascinating.
He does have a point though. There are constantly things that break that only incompetent programmers could mess up.
(Plus, is āIf so!ā a sentence Copernicus?) Just kidding
Ummm. Yeah I donāt think anyone is trying to assume any kind of pretention other than you, who seems to overthink just a bit. Pretty simple straightforward posts other than your rambling.
2 Likes
Take a walk outside ffs nobody cares.
1 Like
You realize the standard for Blizzard employee is not high and mighty like you think. Thereās like 500,000 employees on every gameās credits. Itās not that serious.
Engineers and scientists lmao this guy
Well, youāre more than happy to approach software engineers and say you know more than they do.
What other wild claims are you going to make next?
Want a nobel prize for nothing?
Just because you donāt understand big words doesnāt mean that people are trying to seem smarter. It just means theyāre smarter than you.
1 Like
His ābig wordsā werenāt well used. Heās actually bad at using words, and if you knew anything about how to construct them yourself youād know that Zonex.
You think because someone happens to have a job typing code that theyāre some kind of infallible inspired geniuses, rambling about nothing. They are cabable of stupidity just like you and me.
1 Like
You guys know how I feel about youā¦ pseudo-intellectuals. Fake knowledge. Pretenders.
Iām quite amused at you Mcguint keep going.