Is it, though? Half the time it seems like people make a thread expecting to get universal agreement, and are honestly shocked at even the mildest pushback.
2 Likes
And weāve come full circle to you are either a sadist or some type of orifice designed to extrude waste, lol.
Itās not that bad is something people tell themselves to survive things that are actually that bad.
If you canāt understand that different people like/dislike different things, there isnāt much point in continuing this line of argument.
3 Likes
ā¦which is why I said weād come to a circle and put ālolā in the postā¦
I get that we disagree on an opinion and thatās not going to changeā¦
1 Like
Gotcha. My bad. I got that the first sentence wasnāt serious, but the second sentence kinda muddled the point for me. Iāll chalk it up to not having had my second cup of coffee yet.
1 Like
My opinion is that you have had your second cup. And thatās NOT going to change.
1 Like
Third cup, then?
1 Like
Just understand my opinion is NOT going to change.
1 Like
This would explain sooo muchā¦ youāre playing priest on second or third cup, whereas I play tempo/aggro because I am working on my third POT of coffee this morning.
hahaha.
1 Like
One of Priestās major selling points is that it beats Paladin atm. You must be playing off-meta.
This 100%. It is unfortunate that a class can punish a player for logging into the game and building their own deck. I build a lot of custom decks and memeās that would traditionally work against priest, but all it takes is stealing a few cards from my hand or deck to hint as to what Iām playing and any decently intelligent person can play against my win condition when my cards are revealed. The class punishes deck building. Why?
thatās a terrible analogy
3 Likes
I think he means in the category of entertainment, you only have an alotted amount of time if you have a life outside of entertainment. So if you have 3 hours to see a movie, you donāt want to hear that it can be from 1 hour to 6 hours for your entertainment. Likewise, if you have 15 minutes to play a game of hearthstone, you donāt want to queue up against a priest because you may have to quit mid game. You canāt plan your time for entertainment this way.
1 Like
Yup, thatās what I meant, thank you.
1 Like
The main problem is that its a class with 0 sinergies or themes, its just a stupid ton of removals that kills u by making u feel tired as the time passes.
4 Likes
And while āIā pass.
The games tend to be long in general because of poor sport trolls that rope and boringly slow animations. Remove both and the problem goes away.
2 Likes
Another salty aggro player. I still canāt comprehend how anyone can have fun playing a deck that just involves top-decking and going face. Not like Iām advocating for aggro decks to be removed. Priest already got nerfed twice and wasnāt teir 1 or 2, so I advise you to git guud.
1 Like
I think the issue is that Priest has too many options and too many very consistent ways to control, disrupt your plays, while constantly regenerating cards and regenerating health.
They can Copy anything you put on the field, Copy Your cards, remove your cards from the field and hand.
Your basically walking on egg shells because every card you play, is either guaranteed to die, be copied, or used against you.
Your hope of winning is literally baiting all their removals, their steals, and their copies and somehow come out ahead while they patch up any damage you for fortunate enough to dish out.
With the state of RNG and generation priests can get Generated Minions and Spells at a rate higher than any class It puts them even more in favor of winning as you never know how many copies of a card they have to try to bait out
1 Like
I mostly ignored this thread because itās one of those dime-a-dozen āLetās have the same debate with the same people making the same points but have a slightly different Titleā things. But if it did give the forums one thing, itās someone complaining about a class because you either win or lose against them.
2 Likes