Right there. You say you haven’t made legend “because” and then proceed to make an excuse.
Yep. Keep saying this. People say “it was sarcasm” all the time to cover up uncomfortable truths.
Look, I don’t care how or what you play or what rank you do or don’t get. All I am saying is lots and lots of homebrew players make legend, so that’s not what’s stopping you.
How is this an excuse? Seriously. Tell me how. You are assuming that it is an excuse all because I said I never made it to legend with home brew? That’s it? How one dimensional can you get.
The main point I was making this entire time, is that I want to make it to legend with homebrew. Not that homebrew CAN’T get me to legend:
Honestly, if you were looking for some kind of win. There ya go. I am done with this non-sensical conversation. I’ll be the bigger person here and let you sit on your high horse bud. Have a good Tuesday.
The best players are usually “modifiers of netdecks”. I.e. they have such good understanding of EXACTLY how cards affect their deck and in relation to the current meta that they often will see a card and say “this card here looks better out of the deck and I’ll use that other card in its place” or they do that for a small collection of cards if they want a new combo.
The whole thing ties with how finite the card combinations are; this game has let’s say 0.2% of its players who can IMMEDIATELY create most of the best netdecks right after a major patch; even the best players on the top 10 of the ladder might be slower than them so for the most part even the best constructors of decks aren’t the first to make a netdeck.
Because it’s not true, it’s how you are justifying your performance in your mind. It’s basically saying I’m not legend because I haven’t used good decks, but I’m legend if I try.
And I’m saying prove it, try and get the rank, then tell us about homebrew.
Great. Good for you. But that’s not why you haven’t gotten there yet, which was what you blamed in your first post.